COMM ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 543 OF 2025
29 Jul 2026The background of the case involves the acquisition of land admeasuring 1113.2 sq. mtrs. belonging to the predecessor of Respondents 1 and 2 by the Pe...
Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"
1348 result(s) found
Found 1348 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Appoint Arbitrator in Shareholder Dispute Under Arbitration Act. Court finds existence of arbitration clause and refers parties to arbitration, appointing former judge as sole arbitrator.
8 Jun 2026The petitioners, shareholders of a company, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an...
- 58
High Court
High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdiction and Interest Award Under MSMED Act. Court held that remedy under Section 18 of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 is optional, not exclusive, and ad hoc arbitration permissible, with interest under Section 16 MSMED Act upheld.
10 Mar 2026The dispute arose from a contract for supply of VRLA batteries between Petitioner, a government enterprise, and Respondent, a company registered under...
- 337
High Court
High Court Dismisses State of Goa's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Bridge Construction Dispute, Upholding Rejection of Objections Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
27 Feb 2026The State of Goa appealed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the rejection of its objections under Section 34 of t...
- 758
High Court
Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act to Order Upholding Majority Arbitral Award. Arbitral Tribunal Had Set Aside Termination of CISP Agreement Due to Insufficient Proof of Corruption and Awarded Compensation.
22 Dec 2021The appellant, Anheuser Busch Inbev India Limited (formerly SABMiller India Limited), a beer manufacturing and brewing company, appealed under Section...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award for Sand Removal Contract Dispute. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation of contractual terms was plausible and not perverse, and the award did not violate public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
7 Jan 2021The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an order of the Principal District Judge, Nagpur, ...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatories. The court held that a non-signatory can be bound by an arbitration agreement if there is a direct relationship with the signatory and the transaction, and that enforcement cannot be refused on grounds of public policy unless the award is contrary to the fundamental policy of Indian law.
18 Apr 2016The applicant, Integrated Sales Services Limited, a Hong Kong company, obtained a foreign arbitral award dated 28 March 2010 from an International Arb...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Favour of Decree-Holder Against Judgment-Debtors. Court Rejects Objections Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Including Public Policy, Non-Arbitrability, Fraud, Limitation, and Res Judicata.
18 Apr 2016The applicant, Integrated Sales Services Limited, a Hong Kong-based company, obtained a foreign arbitral award dated 28 March 2010 from an Internation...
- 103
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Anti-Arbitration Injunction in Facilitation Deed Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Has Competence to Decide Validity of Underlying Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
17 Sep 2010The appeal arises from a commercial dispute between MSM Satellite (Singapore) Pte Ltd. (Sony) and World Sport Group (Mauritius) Limited (WSG) concerni...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...
- 99
