Search Results for "appeal abatement"

341 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 341 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging MRT Order in Land Tenancy Dispute. MRT's Reversal of Collector's Order Set Aside for Ignoring Binding Supreme Court Order and Limitation Under Section 33B of Bombay Tenancy Act.

The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petitions challenging the order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated November 30, 2023. The MRT had ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Property Tax Reassessment Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 — Reassessment Based on Capital Value Method Upheld as Valid Exercise of Statutory Power.

The petitioner, Satguru Corporate Services Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging the reassessment of property tax by the Additional Collecto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Division Bench Hears Reference on Appealability of Interim Injunction Orders in Regular Civil Appeals. Reference Concerns Whether Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC Covers Interim Injunctions Granted by First Appellate Courts Under Order 41 CPC.

This matter came before a Division Bench as a reference made by a learned Single Judge of the High Court who doubted the correctness of earlier single...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Civil Suit — Upholds Right of Heirs to Seek Impleadment Under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC. Court holds that abatement of suit against deceased defendant does not automatically bar substitution of legal representatives if application is made within limitation.

The case arises from a civil suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against several defendants, including Balbhim Govind Deshpande (origi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Rejection of KVSS Declaration — Post-Manufacturing Expenses Dispute. The court held that an appeal is pending until the order is communicated to the party, and thus the declaration under Section 95 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998 was validly filed.

The petitioner, M/s. Pepsico India Holdings Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing aerated water, soft drinks, and fruit-pulp based drinks, was issu...