Search Results for "acquisition complete"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "acquisition complete"

1600 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1600 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Declaration Under MRTP Act — Developer Without Locus Standi as Development Agreement Was After Purchase Notice. The court held that a developer who acquires interest after a purchase notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act cannot challenge the subsequent acquisition declaration under Section 126(4) read with Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

14 Feb 2006

The petitioner, a partnership firm of builders and developers, challenged a declaration issued by the Government of Maharashtra under Section 126(4) o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

17 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Application for Leave to Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Acquiring Body Not a Necessary Party Under Section 18 Reference Proceedings. The court held that the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, not being a party to the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, has no locus standi to seek leave to appeal against the award enhancing compensation.

27 Oct 2016

The Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC) filed two civil applications seeking leave to appeal against awards passed by the reference Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Gosikhurd Project Due to Non-Compliance with Section 11 of RFCTLARR Act. Failure to Issue Notice and Conduct Social Impact Assessment Renders Acquisition Invalid.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, 25 individuals from Adyal village in Bhandara district, filed a writ petition challenging the land acquisition proceedings initiated ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for a Residential Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Under the Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.

11 Jul 2014

The provided judgment text is an incomplete excerpt containing only the listing of multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for CIDCO Project, Upholds Validity of Acquisition Under 2013 Act. Court holds that acquisition under the 1894 Act had lapsed but was validly revived under the 2013 Act, and that the Court Receiver was not in possession at the time of taking over.

26 Nov 2024

The case involves three writ petitions concerning the acquisition of land bearing survey no. 59/8 at Village Asudgaon, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench adjudicates multiple appeals and cross-objections under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, concerning compensation for lands acquired for a minor irrigation tank in Kakhandaki Village. The dispute involves the correct determination of market value following the Reference Court's enhancement from the initial awards of the Land Acquisition Officer.

24 Apr 2020

These appeals under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and cross-objections under Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Petitions on Withdrawal of Land Acquisition and Lapsing of Reservation under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The Court considered whether the reservation for a secondary school on CTS No.398, Tardeo, lapsed due to alleged non-compliance with acquisition timelines and the validity of the State Government's withdrawal of acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

10 Jul 2015

The dispute concerned land bearing CTS No.398, admeasuring about 2339 sq. meters situated at Tardeo, Mumbai, reserved for a Secondary School in the sa...

High Court

KAHC010022932010_1

11 Jul 2014

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, challengi...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Acquisition Proceedings Under KIAD Act Due to Non-Passing of Award Within Reasonable Time. The Petitioners Contend that the Acquisition for BWSSB Sewerage Treatment Plant is Unenforceable as No Award was Passed Despite a Decade-Long Litigation.

7 Mar 2019

The case pertains to writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru by M...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)