High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Void Order"
5041 result(s) found
Found 5041 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Release of Sealed Factory Premises in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Comply with Supreme Court's Conditional Order. Interest Demand Under Section 28AA of Customs Act, 1962 is Statutory and Automatic, No Separate Demand Required.
14 Nov 2024The petitioner, B.V. Jewels, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting gold and jewellery, operates an export processing unit in SEEPZ...
- 512
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Validity of AAIFR Order Setting Aside BIFR's Exclusion of ULC Land from Sick Company's Rehabilitation Scheme. The Court Examines Whether the Remand for Modification Was Justified Under SICA and ULC Provisions.
28 Feb 2014The petitioner, Swayam Realtors and Traders LLP, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay ...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Strike Off Defence in Foreign Award Enforcement Proceedings. Security Deposit Condition Not a Bar to Defend Petition on Merits Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC and Section 49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
4 Oct 2012The petitioners, Pacific Basin Handymax (UK) Ltd., filed a Notice of Motion under Order 39 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to st...
- 201
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Winding-Up Petition for Disputed Debt and Lack of Jurisdiction — Foreign Company Cannot Seek Winding-Up of Indian Company Under Sections 433(e), 434 of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that a winding-up petition is not maintainable when the debt is bona fide disputed and the petitioner is a foreign company without a registered office in India.
28 Jul 2015The petitioner, M/s. Arasor Corporation, a company incorporated in the United States of America, filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and (f...
- 59
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment in Writ Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Jamma Malai Lands as Forest Land. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Conservator of Forests' Order Forfeiting Rights Under Section 82 of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, Alleging Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Earlier Judicial Decrees.
17 Feb 2026The writ petition challenged the order dated 16.12.2011 passed by the Conservator of Forests, Kodagu, declaring the petitioners' Jamma Malai lands as ...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recall/Review of Order Allowing Secured Creditor to Release Leasehold Rights. Applicant, an ex-director and guarantor, lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the original application and no fraud or mistake was established.
30 Jul 2013The judgment concerns an application filed by Mr Shashikant Pasari, an ex-director and guarantor of Rajan (Textile) Mills Pvt Ltd (in liquidation), se...
- 214
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blanket Prohibitory Order Under Section 144 CrPC in Bengaluru, Holds It Violative of Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b); Order Cancelling Protest Permissions Against CAA Struck Down as District Magistrate Failed to Apply Mind and Provide Material Facts.
13 Feb 2020The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions challenging an order dated 18 December 2019 issued by the District Magistrate-cum-Commissi...
- 30
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Assessment Nullity Case Due to Amalgamation. Assessment in Name of Non-Existent Entity Held Void Despite Participation by Successor Company.
25 Jul 2019The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which had upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tri...
- 242
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Cross Execution Applications in Share Sale Dispute, Holds Loan Included in Consideration. The court upheld the decree for specific performance of an email agreement, ruling that the loan amount of Rs.10,32,55,000/- was part of the Rs.36.75 crore consideration.
19 Sep 2024The case arises from a dispute between two groups, the Kotharis and the Agarwals, who were equal shareholders in a company called Special Ear, Nose an...
- 464
