Search Results for "Simultaneous holding"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Simultaneous holding"

279 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 279 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Sub-Registrars in Forest Land Registration Case — Limited Scope of Enquiry Under Section 34 of Registration Act, 1908 Precludes Criminal Liability for Registering Prohibited Transactions. Sub-Registrars Cannot Be Held Criminally Liable for Performing Statutory Duty of Registration Without Enquiring Into Title or Legality of Transaction.

11 Oct 2024

The applicants, Dinkar Shankar Deshmukh, Archana Shailendra Pakale, and Manohar Genba Chivhe, were sub-Registrars in the office of the Registrar at Ju...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of CIRP Petition Due to Settlement Agreement - Mediated Settlement Bars Insolvency Proceedings Under Section 61 of IBC, 2016

30 Nov -0001

The appeal was filed by Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jain, a financial creditor, under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against an order da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Securities Claim on Grounds of Forum Shopping. Petitioners Contend That Regulatory Proceedings Against Clearing Member and Arbitration Against Depository Are Distinct, Allowing Simultaneous Pursuit Under Indemnity Principles.

23 Dec 2025

This matter arises from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Constitution Bench Examines Applicability of Part I of Arbitration Act, 1996 to Foreign-Seated Arbitrations. Reference Arises from Conflicting Views in Bhatia International and Venture Global Engineering.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court of India, by a reference order dated 16 January 2008, directed the listing of Civil Appeal No. 7019 of 2005 and connected matters be...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection to Petitioners in Commercial Arbitration Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Exclusive Rights to Manufacture Ice Cream Under 'Vadilal' Brand in Designated Territories Preserved Pending Arbitration Arising from 1993 Family Settlement.

30 Jun 2026

Shailesh R. Gandhi, Bela S. Gandhi, and Vadilal Dairy International Limited (formerly Super Milk Makers Private Limited) filed a petition under Sectio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Culpable Homicide Case Under Section 304 Part I IPC, Rejects Enhancement to Murder. The court affirmed that the offense fell under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC due to a sudden fight without premeditation, and Section 34 IPC applied to co-accused based on instigation, not mere presence.

7 Jan 2022

The dispute involved appeals against convictions under Section 304 Part I of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) with life sentences. Accused 3 and 4 appealed...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree Despite Dismissal of Order IX Rule 13 Application — Delay Condoned Due to Pendency of Earlier Proceedings. The Court held that the statutory right of appeal under Section 96(2) CPC is not extinguished by the dismissal of an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, and time spent in bona fide proceedings for setting aside the ex-parte decree constitutes sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

1 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the defendant-appellant against the order of the Madras High Court refusing to condone the delay of 546 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets 'Filed' in ITO Order as Termination of Proceedings Under Section 34 of Income-tax Act, 1922. The Order That a Case is 'Filed' Disposes of the Proceeding, Rendering Fresh Notice for Reassessment Valid.

3 Oct 1966

The case arose from reassessment proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1922. The Additional Income-tax Officer issued a notice under Section 34 and, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. The court held that no substantial question of law arose for consideration as the findings of fact by the lower appellate court were based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

5 Mar 2024

The present second appeal arises from a suit for declaration and injunction filed by the appellants (original plaintiffs) claiming ownership and exclu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.

21 Jun 2016

The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)