Search Results for "Separate land compensation"

1181 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1181 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Subsequent Purchaser in Land Acquisition Case — Purchase After Section 4 Notification Confers No Right to Challenge Acquisition or Invoke Section 24 of 2013 Act.

The Supreme Court considered whether a purchaser of land after issuance of a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can invoke...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Multiparty Dispute Over Land Ownership and Compensation Under Inam Abolition Act. Privy Council Declaration of Inam Title and Forest Management Agreement Form Core of Dispute Over 157‑Acre Property Transferred to CIDCO Without Acquisition.

The dispute concerned a large parcel of land bearing Survey No. 51/0 at Ulwe, Raigad, originally granted in 1816. The Bivalkars claimed ownership thro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Land Reserved for Garden Since 1976 — Award Under Section 23 of RFCTLARR Act 2013 Quashed as Acquisition Not Completed Within Statutory Period

The petitioners, owners of land in Kankavali, challenged the reservation of their land for a garden under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010306442014_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Held Validly Taken Despite Existence of Structures. Panchnama and Rapat Sufficient to Constitute Taking of Possession Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The State of Haryana appealed against the High Court's judgment that declared the acquisition of the respondent's land as lapsed under Section 24(2) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Judgment on Interpretation of Section 24 Proviso in Land Acquisition Act. The proviso to Section 24 of the 2013 Act governs Section 24(2), not Section 24(1)(b), as held in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the Division Bench judgment in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh, which held that th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Interest Case. Reference Court's Order Granting 15% Interest from Date of Application Upheld Under Section 34 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the Judgment and Order dated 26th February 1992 passed by the Reference Court of Joint District Judge at Nas...