Search Results for "Section 38(3)"

516 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 516 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds That Deletion of Leave Requirement Under Section 378 CrPC Does Not Automatically Entitle Complainant to Admission of Appeal for Final Hearing. The Court Must Still Apply Its Mind to Merits Before Admitting Appeal.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by complainants against acquittal. The core legal issue was whether, after the amendment to Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Dismissal of Proceedings Under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827. Successive Applications for Legal Heirship Certificate Not Barred by Res Judicata as Proceedings Are Summary in Nature.

The petitioners, Parvatabai and Suresh More, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18/06/2018 passed by the 11th Joint Civil Judge Senior D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Executing Court's Order in Partition Execution — No Jurisdictional Error Found. Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree and Objections Under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC Must Be Raised Before Sale Confirmation.

The case arises from a partition suit (Partition Suit No.945 of 1968) filed by the heirs of Bachhusingh, who died intestate on 24-11-1964, concerning ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Tribunal's Deletion of Addition on Transport Creditors Upheld. Assessee's claim for transport creditors allowed as ITAT found no justification for addition under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 27.11.2...