Search Results for "Section 25F compliance"

168 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge's Order in Retrenchment Dispute, Examining Scope of Industrial Tribunal's Jurisdiction. Key Issues Include Whether Tribunal Could Determine Legality Under Section 25F When Reference Limited to Justifiability of Retrenchment.

The appeal arose from an industrial dispute concerning the retrenchment of seven workmen by M/s DBH International Ltd., a clearing and forwarding agen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against U.P. Jal Nigam in Workmen Reinstatement Dispute — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court Held That the Order Dated 07.09.2015 Only Required Giving Preference to Retrenched Workmen for Future Vacancies, Not Automatic Reinstatement.

The present contempt petitions arose from an order dated 07.09.2015 passed by the Supreme Court disposing of a batch of Special Leave Petitions filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Continuity and 30% Backwages for Workman in Industrial Disputes Act Case. Employer's Challenge Dismissed for Failure to Produce Evidence of Abandonment or Non-Completion of 240 Days Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment arises from two Special Civil Applications filed under Articles 14, 21, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India read with the Industria...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with 30% Backwages for Workman. Termination of Daily Wager Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal.

The judgment arises from two Special Civil Applications filed under Articles 14, 21, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India read with the Industria...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Industrial Dispute — Petitioner Company Failed to Show Perversity or Jurisdictional Error in Awards Granting Relief to Workmen.

The petitioner, Electropneumatics And Hydraulics India Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging separate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employer's Petition in Industrial Dispute — Reinstatement Upheld but Backwages Reduced. Workman's Termination Found Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but Full Backwages Denied Due to Lack of Evidence of Unemployment.

The petitioner, an employer, challenged an award of the First Labour Court, Thane, in Reference (IDA) No. 81 of 2014, which directed the petitioner an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Workman in Frankie Stall Dispute — Termination Found Illegal Due to Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Employer's Claim of Abandonment of Service Rejected as Unsubstantiated.

The petitioner, M/s Milestone (Franki Stall), a proprietary concern running a Frankie stall, employed the first respondent, Mathew D'souza, as a helpe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Retrenched Daily Wagers Challenging Termination Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act. Appointments for 11-month periods without indicating temporary nature deemed regular, termination illegal.

The petitioners, Arun Rambhau Phatak and Sarjirao Mahadeo Bhalerao, were working as Helpers to Cooks on a daily wage basis from 1984 to 2001 at Mahatm...