Search Results for "SMA"

163 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 163 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Exercises Suo Motu Jurisdiction and Hears Public Interest Litigation Challenging Alienation of Communidade Land to Builders. Alleged Fraud and Violation of Goa Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964 and Goa Land Use (Regulation) Act, 1991 in Consent Decree and Sale Deeds.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard two connected writ petitions – a public interest petition (WP 294/2008) by Pilerne Citizens Forum and a suo mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Appellant's claim of loan advanced to friend fails as no legally enforceable debt existed, leading to acquittal under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Shri Datta S. Nadkarni, filed a criminal appeal challenging the acquittal of the first respondent, Mr. Salvador Fernandes, from an offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Tahsildar Order in Land Dispute Involving Archak Family of Kolluru Mookambika Temple — Lack of Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. Order under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 set aside as petitioners were not heard before eviction.

The petitioners, K N Parameshwara Adiga and Kalidasa Bhat, residents of Kolluru village and belonging to the Archak family of Sri Kolluru Mookambika t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Under Section 26 of Domestic Violence Act in Divorce Proceedings. Application Under Section 26 of DV Act Held Maintainable in Civil Suit for Divorce, and Appeal Under Section 29 Lies to Sessions Court Against Order of Civil Court.

The petitioner, Shri Narayan Babi Salgaonkar, a police constable, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging an or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Revision Application Under Mamlatdar's Court Act Due to Bona Fide Mistake of Lawyer. Petitioner's Delay in Filing Revision Before Additional Collector Condoned as Lawyer's Erroneous Advice Constitutes Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act.

The petitioner, Mohan Khemlo Bandekar, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16/10/2014 passed by the Additional Collector-II, North Goa, r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Maintainability of Civil Revision Against Director's Order Under Section 66(7) of Goa Panchayat Raj Act. Order of Director of Panchayats under Section 66(7) is final and binding, and no Civil Revision lies under Section 201-B of the Act.

The petitioner, Competent Automobiles Company Ltd., applied for a licence to construct a Beach Resort at village Arossim, Goa, based on a technical cl...