Search Results for "Religious Instructions"

160 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 160 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Tenants Challenging Redevelopment of Dilapidated Building. Tenants' objections under DCPR 2034 rejected as redevelopment was approved by majority and TAC.

The Bombay High Court dismissed seven writ petitions filed by tenants of a building named 'Haji Manzil' located in Bandra, Mumbai. The building, const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Bhima Koregaon-Elgar Parishad Case Under UAP Act. Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 and Entitles Accused to Bail Despite Section 43D(5) Bar.

The appellant, Hany Babu, a professor and academic, was arrested on 28 July 2020 in connection with FIR No. 1 of 2020 registered by the National Inves...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Interim Protection to Journalist in Multiple FIR Case Based on News Broadcasts. Court Transfers One FIR for Investigation, Stays Other Proceedings, and Emphasizes Balance Between Freedom of Speech and Criminal Process Under Article 19(1)(a) and Article 32 of the Constitution.

The dispute arose from two news broadcasts by the petitioner, a journalist and editor-in-chief of Republic TV and R Bharat, on 16 April 2020 and 21 Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Contemnors Guilty for Breach of Undertakings in Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award. Repeated assurances to court regarding protection of assets were violated by transferring shares, constituting civil contempt under Article 129 of the Constitution.

The case arises from a dispute between Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited (the petitioner) and the respondents in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.20417 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Family Court Order Disturbing Child Custody Based on Consent Without Welfare Inquiry. The court held that a custody order under Section 8 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 cannot be passed solely on consent without considering the welfare of the child.

The case involves an appeal by the father (Appellant 'A') against a Family Court order dated 15 July 2014 that disturbed the custody of his two minor ...