Search Results for "Prosecutrix testimony"

516 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 516 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Age Not Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt and Testimony Lacked Corroboration.

The appellant, Prakash s/o Bhairuram Dhari, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Nagpur in Special Child Cri. Case No. 37/2018 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 417 IPC for Cheating Upheld Based on False Promise of Marriage.

The appellant, Sunil Janya Dabka, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, for offences under Section 376 (rape) and Section 417 (chea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unexplained Delay. Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Contradicts Allegation of Forcible Rape Under Section 376 IPC.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment dated 25.04.2003 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Prosecution Case.

The appellant, Ashpak Lalmohammad Mohammad Ansari, was convicted under Section 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code for gang rape and sentenced to ten y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Prosecutrix Lacks Credibility and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Forcible Intercourse.

The appellant, Hiraman Jangu Uike, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 376 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(1), 417, and 109 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Inconsistent and Not Credible.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by three appellants against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, in Sessions Trial 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ganesh Laxman Korde, was convicted by the learned Special Judge, Ambajogai, in Special Case No. 2 of 2007 for offences under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Section 354 IPC Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Outraging Modesty of an 8-Year-Old Girl Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Rape and Testimony of Prosecutrix Was Unreliable.

The appellant, Vasant Hindurao Patil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, for the offence punishable under Section 354 of the In...