Search Results for "Prevention of Corruption Act"

458 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 458 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Government Engineer in Lokayukta Case — Source Information Report Lacks Credible Material. Court holds that mere source information without verification cannot justify registration of crime under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, an Assistant Executive Engineer in the Public Works Department and currently functioning as Assistant Director of Town Planning, Yelah...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Corruption Case Against Private Individuals for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Private individuals not being public servants, the FIR under PC Act was an abuse of process and quashed.

The petitioners, who are private individuals not holding any public office, filed petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Approval for Investigation Against Public Servant Under Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Approval Granted Without Application of Mind and Without Considering Relevant Material

The petitioner, Smt. Shreeroopa, a public servant, challenged an order dated 19.08.2023 passed by the State of Karnataka granting approval under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Sanction Order in Disproportionate Assets Case Against IRS Officer — Sanctioning Authority Failed to Apply Independent Mind and Relied on CBI Report Without Proper Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Vivek Batra, an Indian Revenue Service officer, challenged the sanction order dated 09.10.2012 granted by the Union of India for his p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Independent Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Appasaheb Narayan Jadhav, a Talathi (public servant) in Dafalapur, Sangli, was convicted by the Special Judge, Sangli, for offences und...