Search Results for "POCSO"

519 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 519 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 3/4 of POCSO Act and Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove penetrative sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kishor Shankar Palve, was convicted by the Special Court and Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, for offences under Section 3 punish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony. Victim's Admission of Voluntary Association and Contradictions in Evidence Lead to Benefit of Doubt Under Section 366 IPC and Section 5(1) r/w Section 6 of POCSO Act.

The appellant, Popat Navasu Bendkoli, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO), Nashik, for offences under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Sections 354, 363, 342 IPC and Section 8 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child under POCSO Act.

The appellant, Satish s/o Bandu Ragde, was convicted by the Extra Joint Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Special Child Protection Case No. 28 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Allegation of Groping During Religious Procession Fails as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Own Witnesses and Medical Evidence Not Adduced.

The appellant, Dinesh @ Nitin Ukandrao Khandate, was convicted by the Special Court under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in POCSO and Rape Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence, Establishing Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Rape Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC.

The appellant, Devanand S/o Tarakram Bhagat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Achalpur, in Spl. (POCSO) Case No. 122/2016 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Age Proved by School Records. The court held that minor contradictions do not discredit the victim's evidence and the presumption under Section 29 POCSO Act applies.

The appellant, Akash s/o Devanand Tempe, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special Criminal (POCSO) Case No. 198/2016 for the offence pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Father in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Under Sections 354, 323 IPC and Section 8 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ajay Dhengre, was convicted by the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special Criminal Case No.48/2016 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault on a Deaf, Dumb, and Bedridden Minor Child under POCSO Act and IPC. Mother's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offence of Rape and House Trespass.

The case involves the conviction of Mukesh son of Tulshiram Madavi for offences under Section 454 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 6 read wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 read with Section 3 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The case involves three appellants: Ganesh @ Gorakh Tatyarao Jadhav (original accused No. 1), Muskan w/o Shaikh Rashid @ Rafiq (original accused No. 2...