Search Results for "Numbering"

157 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 157 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Lack of Material Facts in Recount Application. Allegations of Improper Counting Must Be Supported by Specific Averments Under Section 83 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

The case involves an election petition filed by Rashmi Digambar Bagal challenging the election of Narayan Govindrao Patil from the 244 Karmala Assembl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder and Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 302, 307, 120-B IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Criminal Conspiracy and Stabbing Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Goa appealed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, South Goa, Margao, which acquitted the respondents (original accused)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will in Favor of Executor Despite Allegations of Suspicious Circumstances. Will executed by testatrix with firm signature and solicitor-drafted formality upheld as valid under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The plaintiff, Chittaranjan N. Negandhi, sought probate of a Will dated 24th May 1973 left by his mother, Bhanumati Narottamdas Chapsi. Bhanumati died...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Lack of Jurisdiction in Bank Guarantee Dispute — Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract Confers Jurisdiction on Chennai Courts. Plaintiff L&T's Suit Challenging Invocation of Performance Bank Guarantee Dismissed as Bombay High Court Has No Territorial Jurisdiction.

The plaintiff, Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T), filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that the invocation of a Performance Bank Gu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Charges Under SC/ST Act for Lack of Public View Element in Caste-Based Insult Allegation. Offence under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 requires insult to be in public view, which was absent as incident occurred inside a house.

This judgment arises from a criminal revision application filed by three applicants (original accused) challenging an order dated 07/09/2015 passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution Violated by Failure to Furnish Statements of Co-Accused and Retraction Letters.

The petitioner, Deepak Bapu Keluskar, challenged a detention order dated 29th September 2014 passed by the detaining authority under Section 3(1) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Dropping of Corruption Case for Lack of Sanction. Trial Court's Order Dropping Prosecution Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Upheld as Sanction Under Section 19 is Mandatory.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 07.12.1999 passed by the Special Judge, Pune, in Special A/C Case No. 6 of 1991...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Abortion Case Due to Medical Necessity and Marital Discord. FIR under Section 315 IPC quashed as abortion was medically necessary to save mother's life and complaint was filed after long delay due to marital discord.

The applicants, including the wife (applicant no.1) and her relatives, sought quashing of FIR No. 201/2014 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Family Members in Cheque Theft and Forgery Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Only the Employee-Accused (Applicant No. 1) Faces Trial Under Sections 381, 468, 469, 471 read with 34 IPC.

The applicants, including Ashok Banarsi and his family members, challenged the order of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur, date...