Search Results for "MHADA Act"

310 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 310 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Reservation for Sports Complex in Development Plan. Court upholds reservation of land for a multipurpose sports complex under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, rejecting claims of non-implementation and lack of public purpose.

The Bharatiya Adhyatmic Society, a public charitable trust, owned land in Chembur, Mumbai. The land was reserved for a 'Chembur Multipurpose Complex' ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Discrepancy in Date of Knowledge of Dishonour — Notice Held to be Within Time as Complainant Received Information on 23rd May, 1997.

The appellant, Tarachand Paliwal (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Rupesh Paliwal), filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Decree on Admission in Lease Dispute Over Overlapping Land Allotments. Order XII Rule 6 CPC Decree Set Aside as Lease Deeds Pertained to Different Survey Numbers and No Clear Admission of Liability Was Made.

The appeal arose from an order and judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court granting a decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Application in Development Agreement Dispute — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out as Agreement Was Terminated for Non-Performance. Specific Performance Claim Requires Trial; No Irreparable Loss Shown.

The Plaintiffs, Shantilal J. Shah and others, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a Development Agreement dated 25th September 2007 and an Irrevoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Impleadment Application in Suit Challenging MHADA Notice. The court held that the petitioner, a company, was not a necessary or proper party to the suit between tenants and MHADA and had no right to be impleaded.

The petitioner, Orbit Corporate Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 9-2-2012 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Shifting Agreements in MHADA Redevelopment Project — Collector of Stamps Lacked Review Power and Agreements Were for Temporary Shifting, Not Permanent Alternate Accommodation Under Article 25(d) of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

The Petitioner, Guruashish Construction Pvt. Ltd., a builder and developer, entered into a tripartite Joint Development Agreement dated 10 April 2008 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Under Urban Land Ceiling Act — Petitioners Failed to Show Entitlement to Surplus Land or Compliance with Statutory Requirements

The judgment involves a group of writ petitions filed by various individuals challenging the acquisition of their lands under the Urban Land (Ceiling ...