Search Results for "IPC 511"

214 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 214 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Police Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC in Threat Email Case — Magistrate's Refusal Upheld as No Cognizable Offense Disclosed.

The applicant, Mukund Balvirsingh Thakur, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the Bom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dacoity Conspiracy Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Preparation. Petitioners' names were shown as absconding in FIR under Sections 399 and 402 IPC without any material to show they were part of any assembly to commit dacoity.

The petitioners, Imran Khan @ Imran Pasha and Imran Pasha, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Attempt to Suicide Charge Against Accused in Criminal Case — No Material to Show Actual Attempt Made. Section 309 IPC Requires Overt Act Towards Suicide; Mere Intention or Preparation Insufficient.

The petitioner, Kaviraj.S, was charge-sheeted for offences under Sections 309, 504, and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in C.C.No.105/2017 arisin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Prosecution Evidence. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Prosecutrix Found Inconsistent and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape.

The appellant, Soma Balkrushna Dadore, was convicted by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376 IPC (rape) and Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR. Conviction under Section 354 read with 376(2)(f) r/w Section 511 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jagdish Balaram Narangikar, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 354 read with Section 376(2)(f) read with Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC — Penetration Established by Medical Evidence. The court held that slight penetration is sufficient for rape and the medical evidence corroborated the victim's testimony.

The appellant, Mohammed Gaus Ibrahim Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for the offence of rape under Section 376...