Search Results for "Housing Facilities"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Housing Facilities"

446 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 446 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case Under Section 80-IA(4). Tribunal's finding that assessee qualified as developer of infrastructure facilities for Srisailam and Koyna projects was upheld, as assessee undertook development work and transferred facility to government, meeting statutory criteria under Income-Tax Act, 1961.

11 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, challenging orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging De-registration of Housing Federation in Ongoing Real Estate Project — RERA Rule 9(1)(ii) Overrides MCS Act for Formation of Apex Body Before Project Completion.

22 Nov 2024

The petitioner, Lodha Belmondo Housing Federation Ltd., a federation registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, challenged the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Dissenting Members in Cooperative Housing Society Redevelopment Dispute — Majority Decision Upheld. Court holds that minority members cannot stall redevelopment process approved by 80 out of 88 members, and objections regarding additional area do not justify interim injunction.

8 Nov 2023

The case involves an appeal by 8 members (appellants) of Neel Shantiniketan Co-operative Housing Society Limited against an order of the City Civil Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Plaint Rejection Upheld for Lack of Civil Court Jurisdiction. Dispute over mortgaged properties held to be exclusively triable by DRT under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

4 Sep 2023

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi and Vandana (plaintiffs) against the Gadhinglaj Urban Co-operativ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeals in Consumer Dispute Over Delayed Housing Project. Developer's liability to refund allottees upheld due to breach of construction timeline under Tripartite Agreement, with consumer fora jurisdiction affirmed despite arbitration clause.

13 Apr 2023

The dispute arose from a housing project named 'Pride Asia' in Chandigarh, where the Chandigarh Housing Board (CHB) was appointed as the nodal agency ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging DJR's Order in Co-operative Society Dispute. DJR Exceeded Jurisdiction by Re-appreciating Evidence in Disqualification of Defaulting Directors Under Section 152 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

14 Oct 2022

The petitioner, Pravin Indarchand Jain, a member of Mahavir Nagari Sahakari Patpedhi Maryadit Chopda (Mahavir Society), filed complaints before the Di...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia) Not Applicable When TDS Deducted and Paid Before Due Date of Filing Return Under Section 139(1). The court upheld the ITAT's order deleting disallowance, holding that the proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) allows deduction if TDS is paid before the due date under Section 139(1).

28 Feb 2014

The case involves three appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

29 Jan 2014

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Member for Being Servant of Agricultural Produce Market Committee. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Held to be a Local Authority Under Section 14(1)(i) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958, and Section 3(31) of General Clauses Act, 1897.

22 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Babasaheb Devram Sathe, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat, Jalgaon Budruk, in 2010 and also functioned as Sarpanch. The fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction Under MHADA Act — Petitioners Failed to Establish Legal Right Over Encroached Land. The court held that the respondents acted within their powers under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, and the petitioners were not entitled to any relief.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, M/s Twin & Deccan Builders and others, filed two writ petitions challenging the demolition of structures on land at Andheri, Mumbai, ...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)