Search Results for "Finance Act 1951"

149 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charge Sheet Against Income Tax Officer for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Disciplinary proceedings initiated without prior sanction from the Central Government are invalid as the officer was not removable from service without such sanction.

The petitioner, Shri Nai Pal Singh, an employee of the Income Tax Department working as Commissioner of Income Tax (Departmental Representative), file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Possession Claim by Lessee in Company Liquidation — Official Liquidator Directed to Hand Over Property Subject to Lease. Leasehold Rights Survive Winding Up and Official Liquidator Must Respect Lessee's Right to Possession Under Section 456 of Companies Act, 1956.

The Provident Investment Company Ltd., a Government of Madhya Pradesh undertaking, filed an application seeking possession of leasehold land admeasuri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Tribunal Correctly Held Commissioner Not Justified Under Section 263 for Alleged Double Deduction of Excise Duty. Assessing Officer Followed Permissible View and Assessee Did Not Claim Deduction Twice.

The present appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Central Excise Appeal — No Power to Review Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944. Section 35L of the Act Bars Application of CPC Provisions on Review, Hence Review Petition Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, VIP Industries Ltd., filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an earlier order that dismissed its applic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SFC Petition for Enforcement of Guarantee Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act, 1951. Guarantor's Liability Held Co-extensive with Principal Debtor Despite Non-Enforcement Against Principal Debtor.

The petitioner, SICOM Limited, a State Financial Corporation, filed a petition under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SICOM's Petition Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act Against Guarantors for Recovery of Loan Defaulted by Borrower Company. Guarantors Held Jointly and Severally Liable Under Common Deed of Guarantee for Term Loan Granted to Principal Borrower.

The petitioner, SICOM Limited, a State Financial Corporation, filed a petition under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, s...