Search Results for "Employees' Provident Fund Scheme"

451 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 451 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Assistant PF Commissioner Due to Delay and Laches in Challenging EPF Damages Order. Petition filed nearly three years after impugned order without explanation for delay, and no merit found in challenge to damages calculation under Para 32A of EPF Scheme, 1952.

The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (petitioner) filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Pension Grant to Scheme Employees Under Uttar Pradesh Cane Service Rules. Employees of Antar Gramin Sadak Nirman Yojana Held Entitled to Pension and Retiral Benefits as Per Government Decisions and Precedent in Vinod Kumar Goel.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dated 18.05.2016, which held that employees appointed under the Antar Gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Unauthorised Absence from Qualifying Service for Pension in DTC VRS Cases. The court held that period of absence without authorisation cannot be counted towards qualifying service for pension under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, even if employee availed VRS.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) against the respondents, ex-employees who had availed of the Vol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Retired Teacher Seeking Pension Benefits in Kendriya Vidyalaya Pension Case Due to Cut-off Date. Cut-off Date of 1st January, 1986 for Pension Eligibility Upheld as Reasonable Classification Under Article 14.

The petitioner, Sindhu Vishwanath Phadake, joined service as a teacher in Adarsh Vidya Bhavan School on 1st November, 1957 and worked until 24th June,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...