Search Results for "Employees' Compensation Act, 1923"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Employees' Compensation Act, 1923"

243 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 243 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Manufacturer in Workmen's Compensation Case — No Substantial Question of Law Raised Under Section 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. The appellant failed to formulate any substantial question of law, leading to dismissal of the appeal against the Labour Court's award of compensation to the legal heirs of the deceased workman.

8 Apr 2010

The appellant, Mahindra Gujrat Tractor Ltd., challenged an award dated 12th January 2007 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation Act & J...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer's Admission of Employment and Accident Not Sufficient to Deny Compensation Without Cross-Examination. Commissioner's Dismissal of Claim for Want of Proof Set Aside; Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication Under Employees' Compensation Act, 1923.

18 Sep 2014

The appellant, Shri Ravjibhai Chhotubhai Waghela, filed a claim under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, alleging that he was employed as a driver...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Supervisor Held to be Workman Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. Deceased working as loader in goods lorry is a 'workman' under Section 2(1)(n) of the Act, and the employer-employee relationship was established.

19 Nov 2024

The case involves an appeal filed by the Oriental Insurance Company against an award of compensation by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, U...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Forest Department, Upholds Compensation to Family of Murdered Forest Guard. Death of Forest Guard on patrol duty by unidentified assailants held to arise out of and in course of employment under Section 3 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a First Appeal filed by the Conservator of Forests, Nagpur, challenging the judgment and award dated 24.5.2001 passed by the Commiss...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeals in Workmen's Compensation Cases — Cleaners Held to Be Employees of Lorry Owner, Not Gratuitous Passengers. The court upheld the Commissioner's finding that the cleaners were workmen under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and the insurance company was liable to indemnify the owner.

1 Dec 2020

The appellant, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed five appeals under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, challenging the judgment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Death Not Arising Out of Employment. Deceased lineman died of heart attack while on duty but without any work-related strain; held not compensable under Section 3 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

13 Apr 2023

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a single judgment and award dated 23.11.2001 passed by the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation Tribu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Tractor-Trolley Accident Case — No Liability as Accident Occurred During Sand Loading, Not While Vehicle Was in Use. The Court held that the accident did not arise out of the use of the vehicle under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, as the deceased was loading sand from a river bank when the bank collapsed, and the vehicle was stationary.

11 Feb 2019

The case involves an appeal by the National Insurance Company Ltd. against an order of the Commissioner under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, aw...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals by Zilla Panchayat in Workmen's Compensation Cases — Employer-Employee Relationship Not Established. Commissioner's Award Set Aside as Claimants Failed to Prove That Deceased Were Employees of Zilla Panchayat Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

28 Jun 2022

The case involves two appeals filed by the Chief Secretary of Zilla Panchayat, Belgaum, under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, c...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeals and Affirms Compensation Awards for Six Injured Workmen. The Court Holds That the Commissioner's Findings on Employment and Disability Were Not Perverse and Thus No Substantial Question of Law Arose Under Section 30(1) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923.

23 Jun 2021

Background: The appeals were filed by the insurer, National Insurance Co. Ltd., against six common awards passed by the Labour Officer and Commissione...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Principal Employers in Workmen's Compensation Case, Holding That Contractor's Employee Not a 'Workman' Under the Act. The court set aside the Commissioner's award of compensation and penalty, finding that the deceased was employed by a contractor and not by the appellants.

9 Mar 2023

The appeal was filed by Gowardhan Madanlal Agrawal and Shantabai Gowardhandas Agrawal, owners of a shop complex and residential flats at Jaisthambha C...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)