Search Results for "Dishonoured cheques"

453 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 453 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Bombay High Court Order Setting Aside Interim Compensation Under Section 143-A NI Act. Signatory of Cheque Authorized by Company is 'Drawer' Liable for Interim Compensation Under Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant company entered into agreements with Cane Agro Energy (India) Ltd. (Cane) and made advance payments of Rs.63,46,00,000/- for supply of s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Contempt Conviction for Breach of Undertaking in Loan Recovery Proceedings. Directors' Failure to Honour Court Undertaking Despite Multiple Opportunities Constitutes Wilful Contempt Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Sections 10 and 12.

The Supreme Court considered a special leave petition challenging contempt convictions for breach of an undertaking given during loan recovery proceed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Rebutted by Accused.

The appellant, M. Nagappa, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Pre-deposit Condition in NI Act Appeal for Lack of Reasons. Section 148 NI Act Order Set Aside as Arbitrary, Directs Reconsideration Without Pre-deposit.

The petitioner, Nurallah Kamruddin Veljee, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by the Trial Court and sentenced to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court held that once the cheque and signature are admitted, the presumption of a legally enforceable debt arises, and the accused must rebut it with evidence.

The appellant, Vandana Pandey, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Abhilasha Pande, al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Existent Debt — Loan Allegedly Advanced in 1996 Not Legally Recoverable as Time-Barred Debt Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

The petitioner, accused in C.C. No.35622/2010 for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed a petition under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proof of Debt. Security Cheque for Future Sponsorship Does Not Attract Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Smt. Ranju Batra, proprietor of M/s Admark Incorporated, filed two criminal appeals against the acquittal of respondent no. 1, Bhushan ...