Search Results for "Customs Duty Exemption"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Customs Duty Exemption"

244 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 244 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet Food Bags Classifiable Under CTH 2309.90.10. The court held that the product 'Pet Food' imported in bulk bags of 20 kgs is classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 2309.90.10 as 'other preparations of a kind used in animal feeding' and not under CTH 2309.90.90.

22 Jul 2026

The appellant, M/s. Orange Pet Nutrition Private Limited, filed an appeal under Section 28KA of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging an advance ruling o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Duty Exemption Case for Dredger Components. Imported goods like pumping units and pipes are held as integral parts of a cutter suction dredger, entitling them to nil duty under Notification No. 21/2002-CUS, based on functionality and precedent in Boskalis Dredging India Pvt. Ltd.

1 Mar 2023

The dispute involved an appellant who imported a cutter suction dredger along with accessories such as pumping units, pipes, air compressors, and othe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court in Section 80-IC Tax Exemption Case — Substantial Expansion Does Not Entitle Assessee to Reset 100% Deduction Period. The court held that the fixed exemption structure under Section 80-IC(3) cannot be altered by substantial expansion, and the total deduction period remains capped at ten years.

1 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from a common judgment of the Himachal Pradesh High Court concerning the interpretation of Sec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Withdrawal of Customs Duty Exemption Certificate for Medical Equipment Imported by Cardiologist. Failure to Treat 40% Outdoor and 10% Indoor Poor Patients Free Not Established; Exemption Restored.

7 Mar 2018

The petitioners, Dr. Shashank Bhalchandra Subhedar, a practicing cardiologist, and M/s National Heart Center & Hypertension Clinic, challenged the ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Settlement Application in Customs Duty Case — Settlement Commission Cannot Reject Application on Grounds Not Specified in Section 127B of Customs Act, 1962. The court held that the conditions for rejection of a settlement application are only those enumerated in Section 127B(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, and the Settlement Commission cannot impose additional conditions such as requiring the applicant to admit the entire duty liability before filing the application.

21 Nov 2016

The petitioner, M/s Auto Creaters, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the common order dated 14th March ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Interest on Customs Refund. Petitioner entitled to interest under Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962 from the date of expiry of three months from the date of receipt of the refund order.

16 Sep 2016

The Petitioner, Shelf Drilling International Inc. (formerly Sedco Forex International Drilling Inc.), filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Interest Demand on Customs Duty for Provisional Assessment Prior to Amendment. Interest under Section 28AA of Customs Act, 1962 cannot be levied retrospectively for period before its insertion when provisional assessment under Section 18 did not provide for interest.

10 Jan 2014

The petitioner, M/s. R. K. Chemicals, a proprietorship firm, imported a consignment of Mono Sodium Glutamate in 1996. There was a dispute regarding th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Extended Period Demand Under Section 11A of Central Excise Act — Suppression of Facts Justifies Extended Limitation. Forgings Classified Under Chapter 84 as Machinery Parts, Not Eligible for Exemption Under Notification No.223/88.

24 Aug 2010

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by M/s Rajkumar Forge Limited and its director challenging orders of the Commissioner of Central...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in DEPB Taxation Case - Face Value of Duty Entitlement Passbook Chargeable Under Section 28(iiib) at Accrual, Excess Over Face Value Under Section 28(iiid) at Sale. The court held that the Tribunal erred in holding that the entire sale proceeds of DEPB are not profits under Section 28(iiid) and that face value should be deducted from sale proceeds.

28 Jun 2010

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arose from a decision of the Special Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribun...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)