Search Results for "Compulsory acquisition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Compulsory acquisition"

506 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 506 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeal on Taxability of Capital Gains from Transfer of Shares of a Cayman Islands Company Holding Indian Telecom Assets. The core issue involves whether the offshore transaction is liable to capital gains tax in India under the Income Tax Act, 1961, given that the company's value is derived from Indian telecom assets.

1 Aug 2026

The matter concerned a tax dispute between Vodafone International Holdings BV (VIH), a Netherlands resident company, and the Indian Revenue authoritie...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires proof of financial loss caused by employee's misconduct, not merely disciplinary punishment of compulsory retirement.

4 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Resettlement Project Due to Unexplained Delay of 12 Years. Petitioners' challenge to 2006 order of Divisional Commissioner fails as they failed to demonstrate diligence after personal hearing in 2005.

25 Oct 2024

The petitioners, four individuals who are grandchildren of the original landowner Babasaheb Khadirsaheb Pirjade, filed a writ petition in 2018 challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Inquiry Under Rule 4(2) of Goa, Daman and Diu Land Acquisition Rules, 1972. Failure to Hold Inquiry Under Rule 4(2) Before Issuing Sections 4 and 6 Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Renders Acquisition Void.

16 Dec 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Agostinho Agnelo Sanches, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging two notifications dated 01.07.2009...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Judgment on Interpretation of Section 24 Proviso in Land Acquisition Act. The proviso to Section 24 of the 2013 Act governs Section 24(2), not Section 24(1)(b), as held in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh.

27 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the Division Bench judgment in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh, which held that th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Communication of Award Under Section 12(2) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Proceedings Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Award Not Communicated Before New Act Came Into Force.

4 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Jitesh Bhaiyalal Sahu and Rashmi Jitesh Sahu, owned 1.95 hectares of land in Mouza Morangana, Amravati. The State initiated acquisiti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Land Owners' Appeals and Quashes Land Acquisition Notification Due to Non-Implementation of Scheme Over 32 Years. Non-utilization of 88% of Acquired Land and 23-Year Delay in Compensation Deposit Render Acquisition Proceedings Void Under BDA Act.

28 Oct 2015

The land owners owned property in Sy.No.4 of Boopasandra Village, Bangalore North Taluk. The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) issued a preliminar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA's Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Prima Facie Title. BDA Failed to Establish Ownership Over Suit Property as Revenue Records Showed Private Ownership, and No Acquisition Proceedings Were Proven.

1 Jun 2015

The judgment arises from two connected Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and dec...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Decree Holder's Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Interest Dispute — Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Held Payable from Date of Possession, Not Notification Under Section 4(1). The court clarified that Section 28 explicitly provides for interest from the date of possession, and the executing court's contrary view was erroneous.

28 Feb 2013

The petitioners, M.V. Subba Rao and M.M.G. Prasad, were owners of land in Singapore Village, Sindhanoor Taluk, Raichur District, which was acquired fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case, Reduces Enhanced Compensation. Court holds that mere potentiality of land for non-agricultural use does not justify compensation at rates comparable to developed plots without evidence of comparable sales.

10 Feb 2010

The case involves multiple first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for a housing scheme under th...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)