Search Results for "Chargeable Expenditure"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Chargeable Expenditure"

244 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 244 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Non-Compliance with Procedural Requirements. Notice Issued Beyond Four-Year Limit Without Proper Sanction and Without Disclosing Reasons for Alleged Income Escaping Assessment.

16 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Chennai Container Terminal Pvt. Ltd., challenged a notice dated 26 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

6 Apr 2026

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Corporate Assessee in Income Tax Case — Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period and Without Valid Information. Reassessment under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 invalid as notice under Section 148A(b) was issued beyond three-year limitation period and based on information already considered in original assessment.

28 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Godrej Industries Ltd., challenged a show cause notice dated 24th May 2022 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Lack of Jurisdiction and Limitation — Income Tax Act, 1961 Sections 147, 148, 148A, 149, 151. Reassessment notice issued beyond limitation period and without fresh information under Explanation 1 to Section 148 is invalid.

28 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Godrej Industries Ltd., challenged a show cause notice dated 24th May 2022 under Section 148A(b), an order dated 31st July 2022 under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Notice Issued Beyond Four Years Based on Same Material as Original Assessment Held Invalid.

23 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Vibrant Securities Private Limited, a company engaged in stock broking and proprietary trading, challenged a notice under section 148 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Found in Favour of Plaintiff-Builder Under Memorandum of Understanding. The court held that the Memorandum of Understanding dated 21.5.2011 constituted a binding agreement for sale and the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for grant of injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

5 May 2017

The appellant, M/s. Merces Builders Private Limited, filed an appeal against an order dated 16.4.2016 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Panaji...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax TDS Case — Provision for Interest on Delayed Payments Not Subject to TDS Under Section 194A of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that a mere provision for contingent interest liability does not amount to 'payment' or 'credit' to a specific payee, and thus no obligation to deduct tax at source arises.

2 Feb 2016

The appellant, M/s Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited, a government undertaking engaged in power transmission, filed appeals under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in International Taxation Case — Transfer Pricing Adjustments Not Required for Non-Resident Entities Without PE in India. Settlement Commission has exclusive jurisdiction to determine tax liability of non-resident entities, and transfer pricing provisions under Chapter X of Income Tax Act, 1961 do not apply to non-residents without permanent establishment in India.

28 Feb 2014

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Director of Income Tax (International Taxation), Mumbai, challenging an order dated 31 January 2008 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material — Interest on Refund Net of Interest Paid Under Section 220 Was Fully Disclosed During Original Assessment

19 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Arthur Anderson & Co., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice dated 4 February 2009 issued b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Alleging Misuse of Public Funds by Educational Trust and Trustees — No Prima Facie Case of Mala Fides or Violation of Government Resolutions Established. The court held that the petitioner failed to provide specific evidence of diversion of fees or misappropriation, and the trust had complied with the fee regulation committee's directions under the Government Resolution dated 24-09-2003.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Shri Balasaheb Baburao Jambulkar, an ex-freedom fighter and social worker, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 226 ...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)