Search Results for "Central Sales Tax Act, 1956"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Central Sales Tax Act, 1956"

417 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 417 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Sales Tax Exemption Case — Amendment to Section 8(5) of CST Act Cannot Retrospectively Affect Accrued Benefits Under PSI 1993. The Court held that the State Government's power to grant exemption under Section 8(5) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 includes dispensing with Form C/D requirements, and the 2002 amendment is prospective, not affecting vested rights.

12 Feb 2025

The case involves a challenge by the State of Maharashtra against a High Court judgment that quashed trade circulars and notices seeking to withdraw t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Sales Tax Exemption Case — Vested Rights Not Affected by Amendment. State Cannot Withdraw Exemption Granted Under Section 8(5) of CST Act for Inter-State Sales Prior to 2002 Amendment.

10 Feb 2025

The case involves appeals by the State of Maharashtra against a High Court judgment that quashed trade circulars and notices issued by the Sales Tax D...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Case — Related Party Transactions Must Be Valued Under Rule 11 CEVR Read with Section 4(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Circular dated 01.07.2002 Clarifying Valuation Method for Mixed Sales to Related and Unrelated Parties Is Binding and Correctly Applied by Revenue.

5 Dec 2022

The present Civil Appeal arises from an order dated 30.11.2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against DIC and Sales Tax Department for Refusing Transfer of Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction — Auction Purchaser Not Liable for Previous Owner's Sales Tax Dues. The court held that the auction purchaser under the SARFAESI Act acquires clear title free from prior encumbrances, and the DIC cannot insist on NOC from Sales Tax for transfer of property.

18 Feb 2021

The petitioner, Medineutrina Pvt. Ltd., purchased an immovable property (plot no.206, MIDC, Butibori, Nagpur) in an auction conducted by Punjab Nation...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Territorial Limitation of Sales Tax Exemption After State Bifurcation. Benefit of exemption/deferment granted under unified Madhya Pradesh is confined to the state where the industrial unit is located and does not extend to inter-state transactions with the other successor state.

9 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from the bifurcation of the State of Madhya Pradesh into the reorganised State of Madhya Prade...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Sales Tax Reimbursement Case — Coal and Coke Held Not Same Goods Under Section 15(b) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Reimbursement of State Tax on Coal Not Available When Inter-State Sale Is of Coke, Despite Both Being Declared Goods Under Section 14.

10 May 2019

The State of Jharkhand and its officers appealed against a High Court judgment directing them to reimburse the respondent, M/s. Akash Coke Industries ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Assessment Orders Issued in Trade Name Despite Proprietor's Participation — Estoppel by Conduct Bars Challenge to Notice. The Court held that assessment orders are not non-est merely because notices were issued in the trade name, as the proprietor participated in proceedings without objection.

15 Mar 2016

The case involves multiple sales tax references filed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax against M/s. Klip Nail Care and other respondents. The common q...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

7 Oct 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Finding of Export Sale Under Section 5(1) Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 — Sale Completed by Transfer of Documents After Goods Crossed Customs Frontiers. Letter Dated 16/7/1971 Did Not Alter Original Contract Terms; Sale Held in Course of Export.

18 Feb 2005

The case involves a sales tax reference under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mahar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Sales Tax Officer, Jabalpur in Reassessment Limitation Case. Reassessment Notice Under MP General Sales Tax Act, 1958 Held Time-Barred as Proviso to Section 19(1) Preserved Limitation Period of Three Years Under Repealed Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947.

11 Oct 1966

The dispute arose from reassessment proceedings initiated under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, which had repealed the Central Provinc...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)