Search Results for "Central Motor Vehicle Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Central Motor Vehicle Rules"

280 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 280 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Motor Accident Claim Case, Sets Aside Contributory Negligence Finding Against Passengers. The Court held that the principle of contributory negligence cannot be applied to passengers or their legal heirs when the driver of the car was not negligent in a manner that could be attributed to them.

20 Sep 2024

The case arises from a motor accident on 18th August 2013, where a car collided with a 14-wheeler trailer truck abandoned in the middle of a highway w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence and Lower Income Assessment. Deceased's contributory negligence assessed at 50% and monthly income reduced from Rs. 15,000 to Rs. 10,000 under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

20 Apr 2023

The appeal was filed by the insurer, Go Digit General Insurance Co. Ltd., challenging the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal which had held t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Negligence of Driver Upheld, Multiplier Applied Correctly. The Court enhanced compensation from Rs.15,47,000 to Rs.18,47,000 by adding future prospects and applying multiplier 18 under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

22 Feb 2023

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents of the deceased, Samilulla and Ashrafunisa, seeking compensation for the dea...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation for Paraplegic Minor in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company's Appeal Dismissed. The Court affirmed the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal's award of Rs.33,48,670/- for a 10-year-old boy rendered paraplegic, holding that the insurer is jointly and severally liable to pay compensation with interest.

8 Apr 2022

The case involves an appeal filed by Reliance General Insurance Company Limited against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Managing Director and President of Ford India and Car Dealer Directors in Alleged Fraud Case. Sale of Used Car Disguised as New Model Leads to Allegations of Cheating and Forgery, but Court Finds No Involvement of Manufacturer.

27 Jun 2018

The judgment of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad dealt with three criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Exemption for Transport Vehicles in Motor Vehicles Rules — Rule 118(1)(iv) Exemption for M1 Category Vehicles Held Ultra Vires the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

18 Feb 2016

The petitioner, a retired HAL employee, filed a public interest litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the not...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Financier in Motor Vehicle Tax Default Case — Financier Not Liable for Tax Default of Borrower Under Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957. Hypothecation Does Not Confer Possession or Control, Hence No Prima Facie Case Against Financier.

11 Mar 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Shriram Investments Ltd. (now amalgamated with Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd.), was a financier for a commercial vehicle bear...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163-A MV Act — Insurer Liable Despite Alleged Licence Violation. Claim under Section 163-A is no-fault liability; insurer cannot avoid payment on ground of driver lacking licence.

29 Jan 2014

The case arises from a claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 filed by the legal representatives of Babasaheb Wankhede, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in VAT Classification of Electric Bicycle — EBikeMatrix Held to Be a Bicycle Under Schedule Entry C14 of MVAT Act, 2002. The court held that a bicycle with an auxiliary electric motor of less than 0.5 KW and battery backup is a 'bicycle' under Entry C14, taxable at 4%, not 12.5%.

6 May 2010

The appellant, M/s R.K. Rim Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of bicycles, started producing a product called 'EBikeMatrix', which is a bicycle with an auxili...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)