Search Results for "Bombay Public Trusts Act"

529 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 529 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Trust to Sell Land for Temple Development Under Section 36(1)(a) of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1958. Joint Charity Commissioner's Rejection Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind.

The Petitioner, a registered charitable trust under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1958, sought permission under Section 36(1)(a) of the Act to se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Scheme for Public Trust Management — Ex-Officio Trusteeship of Government Officers Held Valid. Court holds that inclusion of Civil Judge and Tahsildar as ex-officio trustees in a scheme under Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 is not illegal.

The petitioner, Nilkanth Vitthalrao Kodhe, filed a writ petition challenging the validity of a scheme framed for the management and administration of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Waqf Tribunal Decree for Possession of Waqf Property. Defendants' claim of adverse possession fails as Waqf property is not subject to adverse possession under Section 107 of the Waqf Act, 1995.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (petitioners) against the decree passed by the Maharashtra Waqf Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Removal of Trustees Under Bombay Public Trusts Act — Charges Not Proved. Section 41D Removal Requires Proof of Specific Charges; Mere Default in Filing Returns Not Sufficient for Removal.

The case involves a second appeal filed by eleven trustees (appellants) against the judgment and order dated 6-3-2012 passed by the Joint Charity Comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Construction Case — No Substantial Question of Law Found. Interpretation of Will and Codicil Held to Be a Question of Fact, Not Law, Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a dispute over the interpretation of a Will and Codicil executed by one Jehangir Bomanji Boman Behram (the testator), a wealthy soli...