High Court of Bombay Decides Writ Petition No. 1811 of 2019 Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The specific outcome and legal findings are not disclosed in the provided judgment excerpt.
15 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Bombay Presidency Rules"
160 result(s) found
Found 160 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Exclusive Nomination Power of Sachkhand Hazuri Khalsa Diwan Under Section 6(1)(viii) of Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Act 1956. The Court Held That the Statutory Nomination Power Vests in the Registered Society, Not in Any Faction or the State Government.
20 Aug 2020The case involves a dispute over the nomination of four members to the Board constituted under the Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Sachkhand Shri Hazur Apchalna...
- 509
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.
17 Oct 2018These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Application to Set Aside Consent Decree in Commercial Execution — Consent Decree Not a Nullity Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Court Holds That Undertakings Given to Court Cannot Be Unilaterally Withdrawn and Execution Proceedings Are Continuation of Suit.
13 Jul 2018The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the original Judgment Debtor No.2 (Firoz A Nadiadwala) and his proprietary firm Base Industries Group see...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Loan Recovery — Bombay Money Lenders Act Defence Rejected as Suit Based on Negotiable Instruments. The court held that the suit based on cheques and bills of exchange is not barred under the Bombay Money Lenders Act, 1946, and the appellant must deposit the principal amount of Rs.67 crores as a condition for leave to defend.
20 Nov 2014The appeal arises from an order of the learned Single Judge granting the appellant (original defendant) leave to defend the summary suit conditional u...
- 158
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Police Order Restricting Entry to Educational Society Premises Under Section 39(1) of Bombay Police Act — Order Held Disproportionate and Without Proper Application of Mind. The court held that a preventive order under Section 39(1) must be based on material showing imminent danger of breach of peace and cannot be used to decide civil disputes over management of a society.
26 Jul 2013The petitioners, Anandraj Y. Ambedkar and others, challenged an order dated 6 July 2013 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, under Section 39...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Decree Holder's Application for Mesne Profit Inquiry as Time-Barred Under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963. Application filed more than three years after decree for possession and mesne profits was held to be barred by limitation, as the right to apply accrued on the date of decree.
6 Feb 2013The applicant, Gajanfar Rafik Ahmed Mirajkar, was the plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No.3/1983, which was decreed on 23.08.2006. The decree granted p...
- 146
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Construction Case — No Substantial Question of Law Found. Interpretation of Will and Codicil Held to Be a Question of Fact, Not Law, Under Section 100 CPC.
13 Feb 2012The case involves a dispute over the interpretation of a Will and Codicil executed by one Jehangir Bomanji Boman Behram (the testator), a wealthy soli...
- 154
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Construction Case — No Substantial Question of Law Found. Interpretation of Will and Codicil Held to Be a Question of Fact, Not Law, Under Section 100 CPC.
13 Feb 2012The case involves a First Appeal registered as such but to be decided as a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The a...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute — Will and Gift Deed Held Invalid. Court Held That the Will Was Not Proved Under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and the Gift Deed Was Invalid for Lack of Acceptance and Registration Under Section 122 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a dispute over a property located at Shanker Bhavan, French Bridge, Mumbai. The appellants, Shantaram Ganpat Gujar and Mrs. Kirti Sh...
- 113
