KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "Bharat Infrastructure"
335 result(s) found
Found 335 result(s)
High Court
High Court Dismisses Arbitration Application and Petition for Interim Measures in Partnership Dispute Over Commercial Project. No Arbitration Agreement Found in Memorandum of Understanding Dated 16 October 2017 Under Sections 9 and 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Thus Relief Denied.
4 Mar 2026The dispute arose from a partnership firm, Respondents, involved in developing 'Ventura Commercial Hub'. The petitioner, was admitted as a partner in ...
- 265
Supreme Court
"Supreme Court's Landmark Decision on Valuation Under Central Excise Act, 1944: Bharat Petroleum vs. Commissioner of Central Excise" "Defining Transaction Value in the Sale of Petroleum Products Between Public Sector Undertakings Under the Central Excise Act."
20 Jan 2025The judgment clarifies the determination of "transaction value" under Section 4(1) of the Central Excise Act for sales made between public sector oil ...
- 499
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses BSNL's Delay Condonation Applications in Section 34 Arbitration Petitions — Delay Beyond 30 Days Not Condonable Under Section 34(3) Proviso. The court strictly interpreted Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that delays exceeding 30 days beyond the three-month limitation period cannot be condoned, leading to dismissal of multiple arbitration petitions.
20 Aug 2019The judgment concerns multiple notices of motion filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) seeking condonation of delay in filing arbitration petit...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CBI Investigation in Bhima Koregaon Case — Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Not Required for CBI Officers. CBI Investigation Valid Under DSPE Act as Section 6A Struck Down by Supreme Court.
5 Dec 2018The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by individuals (Anant Pandurang Kale, Ashwini Kshirsagar, Naveen Kumar Rai and Siraj Razzak Bagwan, Pa...
- 93
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment on Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Input Tax Credit Under KVAT Act. Interpretation of Section 10(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and Availment of Input Tax Credit Irrespective of Invoice Month Framed the Core Issue.
10 Jan 2018A batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed by various companies including...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Foreign Award Enforcement. Court holds that under the amended Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, only the High Court having jurisdiction over the subject matter of the award can entertain interim measures, not any court where assets are located.
9 Oct 2017The petitioner, Trammo DMCC, a company incorporated in the UAE, obtained a foreign arbitral award against the respondent, Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Ch...
- 92
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Awards in Share Subscription Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Findings of Fact Are Not Re-Examinable. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's findings on breach of representations and warranties in Share Subscription Agreement and Shareholders Agreement, holding that the tribunal's interpretation of contractual terms and assessment of evidence cannot be reappraised under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
5 May 2017The present appeal arises from the dismissal of two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by a learned Single Judg...
- 113
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Section 34 Petition Against Foreign Award; Preliminary Objection Raised Pending Determination. Arbitration Agreement Existence and Enforcement of Foreign Award Under Part II Also Examined.
8 Apr 2015The dispute arose from a voyage charter party dated 13 September 2008 between Aurelia Reederei Eugen Friederich GmbH Schiffahrtsgesellschaft & Company...
- 10
