Search Results for "Assam Civil Courts Act"

427 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 427 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Condoning Delay in Arbitration Challenge. Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Held Absolute and Not Extendable Beyond 30 Days.

The appellant, Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd., had provided a loan to the respondent, Maheshbhai Tinabhai Rathod, for purchase of tract...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Filing Section 34 Application Under Arbitration Act. Delay of 30 Days Beyond Three-Month Period Not Condonable as Per Section 34(3) Proviso.

The appellant, Nagrik Sahakari Rugnalaya and Research Center Limited, a cooperative society, challenged an arbitral award dated 10.11.2021 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Default Bail Computation Issue to Larger Bench Due to Conflicting Precedents. The Court Examines Whether Date of Remand is Included or Excluded in Calculating 60/90-Day Period Under Section 167(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for Entitlement to Default Bail.

The Supreme Court addressed a reference concerning the computation of the remand period for default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging the Process of Designation of Senior Advocates Under Section 16 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Issue Concerns Whether the Existing System of Designation is Arbitrary and Violative of Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution.

Background: The case concerned a writ petition filed by a Senior Advocate challenging the prevailing system of designation of Senior Advocates in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Challenge to Lotteries Regulation Act Provisions as Unconstitutional. Court upholds Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 of Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998 and Rule 5 of Lotteries (Regulation) Rules, 2010 as valid and within legislative competence.

The State of Meghalaya filed Original Suit No. 1 of 2021 in the Supreme Court of India under Article 131 of the Constitution, challenging the constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Combined Revision and Writ Petitions Involving Abetment Charge Under IPC and PC Act. Issue of Abetment Surviving Abatement of Principal Offence Arises from Disproportionate Assets Case Against Deceased Public Servant and His Wife.

The matter arose from a disproportionate assets case against a public servant and his wife, accused of criminal misconduct and abetment. The CBI regis...