Search Results for "Armed Forces Tribunal"

181 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 181 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Army Personnel Dismissed for Overstaying Leave on Compassionate Grounds. Held that absence due to wife's illness with medical certificates constituted sufficient cause under Section 39(b) of the Army Act, 1950.

The appellant, Ex Sepoy Madan Prasad, was enrolled in the Army Service Corps on 4th January 1983 as a Mechanical Transport Driver. In 1998, he was gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act as Ultra Vires — State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appeal to Supreme Court. The provision bypassing High Court jurisdiction is invalid for lack of legislative competence under the Constitution.

The Supreme Court considered the validity of Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, which provided for a direct appeal to the Supre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Discharge of Airman for Habitual Indiscipline. Second Warning Not Mandatory Under Habitual Offenders Policy When Competent Authority Decides to Discharge Without Giving Another Chance.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against the judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Lucknow, which set aside the disc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Disability Pension Arrears for Ex-Serviceman from 1995 to 2014. Denial of disability pension to a former soldier for the period between 1995 and 2014 was held misconceived as the disability was later assessed at 20% permanently, entitling him to arrears.

The appellant, Madan Prasad Sinha @ Sanatan Baba, was enrolled in the Indian Army's Corps of Signals as a Radio Mechanic on 18 February 1971. He was d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule 9(1) of Karnataka Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules, 1977 Providing Reservation for Ex-Servicemen and Physically Handicapped. Rule 9(1) Held Valid and Not Violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Pankaj Premanand Nagekar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Army Major's Resignation in Writ Petition Under Article 226 — Rejection Set Aside as Arbitrary. Right to Resign Must Be Considered Reasonably with Disclosure of Valid Reasons.

The petitioners, Major Yogesh Chandra Madhav Sayanakar and Ms. Shruti Kulkarni, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India b...