Search Results for "2021 Office Memorandum"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "2021 Office Memorandum"

484 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 484 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Employer's Writ for ABRY Scheme Benefits — Late ECR Filing Not Fatal to Claim. Clause 5 of ABRY Scheme 3.0 Interpreted as Directory, and Baseline Employees Cannot Be Reduced Retrospectively by EPFO.

6 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Lakshmi Electrical Drives Corporate Services LLP, a manpower services provider in Tamil Nadu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.

23 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSME to Claim VSV Scheme Benefits Despite Reclassification as 'Not an MSME' — Legal Fiction Under Clause 8(5) Notification Extends Non-Tax Benefits for Three Years. The Court held that the Petitioner, re-classified as 'not an MSME' on 9th May 2023, is entitled to the benefit of Clause 8(5) of Notification S.O. 2119(E) dated 26th June 2020 (as substituted on 18th October 2022), which deems it to be a Medium Enterprise for non-tax benefits for three years, and thus eligible for the VSV Scheme.

13 Aug 2024

The Petitioner, Marine Electricals India Ltd., is a company engaged in electronic automation, information, communication, and technical solutions, and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging 10% Performance Security Deposit in Railway Catering Contract. Court holds that Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 prescribing 3% performance guarantee is binding and demand for 10% is arbitrary.

19 Oct 2023

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv & Sons, a proprietorship concern, responded to a tender notice dated 01.03.2023 issued by the Nagpur Division of Central Rai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demand for 10% Performance Security Deposit in Railway Catering Tender. Court holds that demand for 10% performance guarantee instead of 3% as per Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 is arbitrary and unsustainable.

19 Oct 2023

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv & Sons, a proprietory concern, participated in a tender issued by the Central Railway, Nagpur Division, for catering service...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging MCZMA's Refusal of CRZ Clearance for Occupancy Certificate. MCZMA cannot refuse clearance on ground of mismatch between DCR 1991 and DCR 1967 when construction was lawfully permitted under DCR 1991.

13 Mar 2023

The petitioner, MRK Enterprises, a partnership firm, owned a property known as 'Amir House' at Colaba, Mumbai. The petitioner sought a Coastal Zone Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees by Kolhapur Municipal Corporation. Termination of probationers without inquiry and without assigning reasons held illegal and violative of principles of natural justice.

13 Feb 2023

The petitioners, 18 individuals, were appointed as clerks/typists on probation by the Kolhapur Municipal Corporation. Their services were terminated d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Reinstatement Order in Service Dispute - Penalty of Dismissal Set Aside as Disproportionate to Misconduct of Signing Nomination Form. The court held that the punishment of dismissal was shockingly disproportionate to the misconduct of signing a nomination form as Principal, and reinstatement with back wages was justified.

23 Nov 2022

The petitioners, a trust and its college principal, challenged an order of the University and College Tribunal which set aside the dismissal of respon...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part on Operational Creditor Status but Upholds Dismissal on Limitation in Insolvency Case. The court held that a purchaser does not qualify as an operational creditor under Section 5(20) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the application under Section 9 was barred by limitation due to debt arising from 2013 transactions.

4 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a dispute under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving the appellant, Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title Upheld. The court held that the appellants failed to prove their title and possession over the suit property, and the concurrent findings of the courts below did not suffer from any perversity or substantial question of law.

12 Mar 2021

The case pertains to a suit for permanent injunction filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the appellants (original defendants) in re...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)