Search Results for "1964 Rules"

1658 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1658 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal Award Directing Statutory Dock Labour Board to Pay Bonus to Dock Workers; Holds Board Not Employer and Not Carrying on Industry Under Industrial Disputes Act

The dispute arose out of a claim for bonus made by two unions of dock workers at Visakhapatnam Port for the accounting years 1964-65, 1965-66 and 1966...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution; Final Judgment Not Available in Extracted Text. Petitioners Challenge State Government's Ward Reservation Notifications Alleging Arbitrary Deviation from Draft Notifications.

These writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Fraud Case Due to Non-Exhaustion of Alternative Remedies. High Court's Direction to Register FIR Without Prior Recourse to Statutory Remedies Held Illegal Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against an interim order of the Bombay High Court directing police to record the statement of the Director of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010069912016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Agency Dispute — Award Declared Enforceable as Decree. Foreign Award Under Sections 46-49 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Upheld as No Grounds for Refusal Under Section 48 Established.

The petitioner, Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd., a Japanese shipping company, filed a petition under Sections 46 to 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Promotions in Municipal Corporation Due to Lack of Locus Standi and Delay. Petitioners, who were not eligible for promotion to Junior Engineer, cannot challenge promotions of others, and the challenge is barred by delay and laches.

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by employees of the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation challenging the promotions of respondents 3 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...