Search Results for "temporary orders"

2593 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2593 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Second Appeal in Evacuee Property and Tenancy Rights Dispute. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred Where Procedural Violations Under Section 12 of Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 Alleged and Injunction Could Have Been Granted to Tenant Purchaser.

The litigation arose from a dispute over agricultural land bearing Survey No. 316/1 (Gat No.807/1) at Mouza Ghusar, Tahsil Akola, involving competing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case Concerning Probation and Permanency. Employees Entitled to Confirmation After Three-Month Probation Under Model Standing Order 4A, Not Six-Month Contractual Period, and Parity in Benefits Under Settlement.

The dispute arose in an industrial establishment governed by the Maharashtra Industrial Relations Act, 1946 and the Model Standing Orders for Operativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Labour Court Order in Industrial Dispute — Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication on Merits. Failure to Provide Reasoned Decision and Non-Consideration of Evidence Constitutes Violation of Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Limited, challenged an order of the Labour Court, Nashik, dated 30 November 2024, which dismissed the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds 60 Years Retirement Age for Workmen Under Model Standing Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Reduction of Retirement Age from 60 to 58 Years Held Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal and Cross Objection against a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application Seeking Section 340 CrPC Proceedings in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute for Alleged Fabrication of MHADA Affidavit. Court Finds Affidavit Was Authentic, E-filed Under Administrative Directions, and Served on All Parties, Negating Claim of Fraud on Court.

The case involved two writ petitions challenging a slum rehabilitation scheme on MHADA land in Bandra East, Mumbai. The petitioners claimed to be MHAD...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Judgment That Struck Down Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Notifications Under Environment (Protection) Act. Review Petition Seeks Recall Citing Overlooked Binding Precedents.

Background: The present matter is a review petition arising from the Supreme Court's judgment in Vanashakti v. Union of India, dated 16 May 2025, whic...