High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Public Interest Litigation Regarding Unspecified Government Action. The Case Involves Impleaded Respondents Including State Officials and Karnataka Public Service Commission.
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "missing complaint"
1242 result(s) found
Found 1242 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquitted Accused's Writ Petition for Rs.200 Crore Compensation as Acquittal Does Not Automatic Entitlement. The Court Holds That Compensation Under Article 226 Requires Proof of Malicious Prosecution and Violation of Fundamental Rights, Not Mere Acquittal.
5 May 2017The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was filed by the peti...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Circular Restricting Pre-Litigation Counselling Under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Circular Discriminates Against Registered Service Providers and Deprives Women of Sound Advice, Violating Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.
4 Sep 2015The litigation arose from a Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation initiated by Dr. Jaya Sagade, a Professor of Law and Director of a service provider un...
- 137
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Appeal Against Death Sentence for Five Murders; Decision Not Included in Provided Excerpt. Appellant Convicted Under Section 302 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence Involving Alleged Infidelity and Paternity Doubts.
30 May 2023The appellant was convicted by the Trial Court under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to death for the murder of five persons, his w...
- 37
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The Court Examines Whether the Trial Court Erred in Convicting the Accused on Inconsistent Motive Evidence and Weak Circumstantial Links.
7 Aug 2006The appeal arose from the conviction of the accused, aged 24 years, under Section 302 IPC and sentence of life imprisonment and fine by the trial cour...
- 27
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal of Accused Convicted Under Section 302 IPC Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Set Aside as Motive, Last Seen, Recovery Evidence and Dog Tracking Held Unreliable, Failing to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances Pointing to Guilt.
7 Aug 2006This appeal arose from the conviction of the accused, a 24-year-old villager, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 by the Additional Sessi...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Writ Petition, Setting Aside Industrial Tribunal's Finding that Enquiry was Vitiated Due to Unsigned Chargesheet. Court Rules that Non-Signing of Chargesheet is a Procedural Defect and Enquiry is Not Vitiated if Workman Understands Charges and No Prejudice is Established, Applying Test of Prejudice Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
23 Aug 2005The dispute arose from the dismissal of the respondent workman, Prakash R. Parab, by his employer, Indian Airlines Ltd., on charges of theft. The work...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Autonomy of Engineering College and State's Power to Nullify Appointments. Multiple Writ Petitions Challenge Order Terminating 54 Lecturers at College of Engineering, Pune under TEQIP Autonomy.
28 Feb 2019The case involved three writ petitions before the Bombay High Court concerning the autonomy of the College of Engineering, Pune (CoEP) and the State G...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court considers legality of State interference in recruitment by an autonomous technical institute. The dispute centers on the scope of autonomy under Government Resolutions and the power of the Board of Governors to make appointments without State oversight.
28 Feb 2019The College of Engineering, Pune (CoEP), established in 1854, is a premier technical institute. In 2002, under the Technical Education Quality Improve...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Stamp Duty Demand on Development Agreements — Agreements Held to be Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act. The Court ruled that development agreements granting authority to sell flats at developer's discretion and coupled with possession transfer constitute conveyance under Sections 2(g), 2(l) read with Explanation-I of Article 25 of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.
5 Aug 2026The petitioner, a developer partnership firm, entered into two development agreements dated 20.08.1987 and 27.03.1987 with a co-operative housing soci...
