Search Results for "market value compensation"

1531 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1531 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance of Development Agreement in Favor of Purchasers. Agreement for Development Treated as Agreement for Sale Under Specific Relief Act, 1963 as Essential Terms Constitute Sale of Immovable Property.

The appellants, original defendants, were the owners of a property in Pune. They executed a development agreement dated 18th October 2007 in favor of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Applications by State in Land Acquisition Appeals Due to Unexplained Delay of 2014 Days. Delay of 2014 days in filing first appeal against land acquisition award not sufficiently explained, as state failed to provide cogent reasons for each day of delay.

The judgment pertains to a batch of civil applications filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Unit 1 and another (the State) under Section 5 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of State Order Transferring Idol Theft Cases to CBI. Court holds that transfer of investigation without consulting the investigating officer and without court's approval was improper.

The State of Tamil Nadu appealed against the Madras High Court's judgment dated 30.11.2018, which quashed the State Government's order dated 01.08.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Cheque Was Issued as Security, Not for Repayment of Loan.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Vyomesh Jitendra Trivedi, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Partly Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reducing Compensation for Narmada Canal Project. Court holds that 15% annual escalation applied by Reference Court was excessive for interior village land, reducing it to 7.5% per annum.

The case involves a first appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Cross-Objection in Land Acquisition Case for Merits Determination — High Court's Dismissal Without Reasons Set Aside. Cross-Objection Under Order 41 Rule 22 CPC Must Be Decided Independently Even if Main Appeal Is Dismissed.

The Supreme Court allowed appeals by landowners against the dismissal of their cross-objection by the Himachal Pradesh High Court. The land in questio...