Search Results for "default dismissal"

1908 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1908 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Concurrent Findings of Bonafide Requirement in Eviction Suit. Landlord's need for suit premises for dairy business upheld despite minor inconsistencies in evidence.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (tenants) challenging the concurrent findings of the Small Causes Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contractual Forfeiture Case — HUDCO Cannot Forfeit Payments Without Fulfilling Reciprocal Obligations. Allotment Cancellation and Forfeiture of Rs. 28.11 Crores Set Aside as Unjust Enrichment Where Lessor Failed to Execute Agreement to Sub-Lease.

The dispute arose from an allotment letter issued by HUDCO to Tomorrowland Limited for a 99-year lease of land to build a 5-star hotel. The appellant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Dock Identification and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction under Section 395 read with Section 397 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was doubtful and recovery of weapon was not linked to crime.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Vinod @ Nasmulla against his conviction under Section 395 read with Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Redevelopment Agreement — Limitation Period Not to Defeat Substantive Right. Continuing Cause of Action Recognized Where Parties Were in Ongoing Negotiations and Escrow Agent Released Flats Only in December 2018.

The appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by tenants (appellants) against a partnership firm (respondents) concerning a redevelopment project ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Abetment to Suicide Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Instigation or Intent. Conviction under Sections 306/114 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Abetment Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the accused against their conviction under Sections 306/114 IPC for abetment to suicide. The case arose from t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Upholding High Court's Decision. Dispute Involved Agreement of Sale with Issues of Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Limitation Under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appeal arose from a dispute over a registered Agreement of Sale dated 22.11.1990, where appellants 1, 2, and 3 agreed to sell property to responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in SEBI PFUTP Regulations Case Due to Non-Disclosure of Investigation Report. The Court Held That the Investigation Report Under Regulation 9 Must Be Disclosed to Ensure a Fair Hearing Under Principles of Natural Justice, as It Forms the Basis for the Show Cause Notice.

The dispute arose from a show cause notice issued by SEBI to the appellant, alleging violations of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Resolution Plan Approval Case, Overturning High Court's Dismissal. High Court Erred in Not Exercising Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC to Approve Plan Beneficial to Small Debenture Holders, Leading Supreme Court to Use Article 142 Powers for Approval.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals challenging the Bombay High Court's order dated 16 December 2022, which dismissed an interim application file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Division Bench Order in Trade Mark Infringement Suit Due to Non-maintainable Intra-court Appeal. The Single Judge's Order Granting Time to File Affidavit-in-Opposition Was Not a 'Judgment' Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, Making the Appeal Inadmissible.

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the appellant-defendants for infringement of the registered trade mark '...