WRIT PETITION NO.1940 OF 1999
23 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "wrong rule"
5088 result(s) found
Found 5088 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in NI Act Case, Holds Authorization to File Complaint Can Be Inferred from Conduct and Documents. The court set aside acquittal and convicted accused under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of cheque, holding that authorization of complainant's representative was sufficiently proved.
8 Feb 2024The appellant, M/s. Prince Marine Transport Services Private Limited, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 agai...
- 64
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Employees by Goa State Pollution Control Board. Abolition of Posts Held Mala Fide and Termination Violative of Principles of Natural Justice.
29 Sep 2023The petitioners, six women employed by the Goa State Pollution Control Board (GSPCB), challenged their termination from service on 27.11.2014 and the ...
- 109
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Doctor in Medical Negligence Case — Lack of Expert Opinion and Prima Facie Case Under Section 304-A IPC. FIR and charge-sheet quashed as no expert opinion obtained to establish medical negligence.
8 Sep 2023The applicant, Dr. Pramod Yashwantrao Gurjar, an Obstetric and Gynecology Surgeon, performed a cesarean surgery on Smt. Kanchan Atul Kulkarni on 06.03...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitrator's Refusal of Interim Relief in Shareholder Dispute — Term Sheet Not a Binding Arbitration Agreement. Court holds that a Term Sheet containing an arbitration clause does not constitute a binding arbitration agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as it was subject to a definitive agreement and the parties did not intend to be bound by the arbitration clause at the pre-contractual stage.
19 Dec 2023The case involves a dispute between Max Healthcare Institute Limited (Petitioner) and Touch Healthcare Private Limited & Ors. (Respondents) arising ou...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration — Arbitration Clause Survives Termination of Contract. The court held that the arbitration clause in a bunker fuel supply agreement survived termination of the contract, and the appellant's application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was not barred by limitation or waiver.
18 Feb 2020The dispute arose from a bunker fuel supply agreement dated 28th February 2008 between Antikeros Shipping Corporation (appellant), a Liberian company,...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted; failure to show loan in income tax returns does not invalidate legally enforceable debt.
25 Nov 2020The appellant, Pushpa Sanchalal Kothari, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the acquitt...
- 51
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Complainant's Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case — Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court held that the accused failed to rebut the presumption of legally enforceable debt under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Act.
7 Dec 2020The appellant, Kiran Rameshlal Bhandari, filed two criminal appeals challenging the judgment and order dated 20.02.2017 passed by the learned Judicial...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Review Petition, Sets Aside Order Based on Counsel's Concession Contrary to Law. State Not Bound by Concession on Law Regarding Appointment Under Freedom Fighter Scheme.
29 Oct 2010The case involves a review petition filed by the State of Maharashtra and another against an order passed in Writ Petition No.7955 of 2006. The respon...
- 71
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Vessel Maintenance Contract Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Patent Illegality. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation that the respondent was not liable for pre-existing HOTO defects, as the contract did not impose such liability.
18 Oct 2010The petitioner, Oil & Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. (ONGC), challenged an arbitral award dated 2nd April, 2008 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conci...
- 50
