Search Results for "until further orders"

5675 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5675 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka hears a writ petition challenging the assignment of investigation to the Serious Fraud Investigation Office under Section 212 of the Companies Act, 2013. The petition raises issues regarding the permissibility of parallel investigation and violation of natural justice principles.

The petitioner, Exalogic Solutions Private Limited, a one person company incorporated in 2014, sought to quash an order dated 31-01-2024 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Four Petitions Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act by Common Order. Interim Measures Sought by Financing Company Against Borrower and Guarantor for Default in Loan Repayments Secured by Hypothecated Equipment.

L&T Finance Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed four petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Proceedings under Sections 324 and 498A IPC initiated at Mangaluru set aside as no part of cause of action arose within that jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Dr. Aakash Shetty, filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings in C.C.No.1712/2017 (P.C.No.100/2016) pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Hears Challenge to Supersession of Agricultural Produce Market Committee Under Maharashtra APMC Act, 1963 – Issue of Prior Consultation Mandate Under Section 45(1) Raised.

The case involved a challenge to the order dated 24.12.2013 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Yavatmal, under Section 45...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Determines Validity of Arbitrator's Interim Order Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act in MAPA Escrow Dispute. The Court Examines Whether the Order Preventing Parties from Proceeding Before Escrow Agents Was Justified.

The High Court of Bombay, in an arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, considered a challenge to an inte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act as Ultra Vires — State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appeal to Supreme Court. The provision bypassing High Court jurisdiction is invalid for lack of legislative competence under the Constitution.

The Supreme Court considered the validity of Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, which provided for a direct appeal to the Supre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Declares Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 Ultra Vires for Lack of Legislative Competence. State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appellate Jurisdiction on Supreme Court; Provision Invalid.

The case arose from an appeal filed under Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, against an eviction order passed by the Rent Contr...