Search Results for "protection home"

2122 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2122 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Victim Compensation Appeals Under Section 357A CrPC — State Must Compensate Victims Even if Accused Acquitted or Untraced. The court held that victim compensation is a mandatory duty of the State, not dependent on conviction of the accused.

The judgment concerns four criminal appeals (Criminal Appeal Nos. 991, 992, 331, and 854 of 2011) heard together by the Bombay High Court. The appeals...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistencies in Evidence. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 506 Part-I IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nagesh s/o Samayya Made, was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli in Special (POCSO) Case No.21/2016 for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ajaykumar s/o Sambhunath Naik, was convicted by the Special Court, Chandrapur under Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Mother in POCSO Abetment Case — No Evidence of Intentional Aiding. Section 17 POCSO Act requires mens rea and overt act; mere presence or failure to protect insufficient for conviction.

The appellant, Asha Patil, was convicted under Section 17 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) for abetting the se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Live-in Relationship Murder Case. Three accused convicted under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 IPC for murdering the husband of one accused due to illicit relationship.

The case pertains to the murder of Abel Pereira, who was in a live-in relationship with accused No.2 Baya Abel Pereira. Baya developed an illicit rela...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Police Officer Challenging Transfer — Transfer Held to Be Routine Administrative Act. Petitioner Failed to Establish Malafides or Violation of Transfer Rules.

The petitioner, Rajan Ramchandra Bhogale, an Assistant Commissioner of Police (ACP) in Pune, filed a writ petition challenging his transfer from the p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Aggravated Sexual Assault of Minor Under POCSO Act — Seven-Year Sentence Confirmed. Testimony of Victim's Mother and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 9(m) and 10 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The appellant, Dinesh Kumar Jaldhari, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO), Kunkuri, Chhattisgarh under Sections 9(m) and 10 of the Protection o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Declares Police Detention Illegal, Awards Compensation for Violation of Article 21. Unauthorized Custody of Husband at Wife's Parental Home Without Arrest or Remand Constitutes Illegal Detention.

The petitioner, Satish Salvi, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a declaration that his detention by police officers from 15:00 hours on 12 April ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Conviction under Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Yogesh Arjun Maral, was convicted by the Special Court under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 366A and 376 IPC Beyond Reasonable Doubt as Victim's Testimony Was Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Kadamban, was convicted by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in S.C. No. 274/2012 for offences under Sections 366A (kidn...