Search Results for "prior award"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "prior award"

4010 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4010 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Compensation Enhancement for Acquired Land. Court holds that belated acquisition proceedings and failure to pay compensation within five years render acquisition lapsed under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

3 Jun 2026

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by the State of Karnataka and its authorities against the judgment of a learned Single Judge in land a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals as Not Maintainable: Order on Territorial Jurisdiction Not Appealable Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act. The Court Holds That Orders Under Section 9-A CPC Are Not Enumerated in Order XLIII CPC or Section 37 Arbitration Act, Limiting Appeals in Commercial Disputes.

14 Sep 2017

The dispute arose out of two commercial suits filed before the Bombay High Court, where the plaintiffs claimed reliefs and the defendants raised preli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Land Acquisition for Siddhivinayak Temple Trust — Tenants Object to Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for Public Purpose Waiting Hall and Rest House for Devotees. Tenants' Writ Petition Challenges Section 4 and 6 Notifications and Award, Raising Issues of Procedure and Compensation.

4 Jul 2014

The petitioners, a partnership firm occupying a garage on Plot No. 901 at Mahim, Mumbai, challenged the acquisition of that land by the State of Mahar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Appellant in Arbitration Enforcement Dispute — Objections Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Held Time-Barred Despite COVID-19 Extension Orders. Court rules that the suo motu extension of limitation by the Supreme Court during COVID-19 did not apply to the period for filing objections under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the limitation is prescribed under the Arbitration Act itself.

26 Aug 2022

The case involves appeals by Walter Bau AG, a German company, against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) concerning the enforcement of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claims Without Proper Consideration of Contractual Provisions and Evidence. The court found that the tribunal's interpretation of the price variation clause, extra items, and compensation for delay was perverse and contrary to the plain language of the contract, warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking, a joint venture contractor, was awarded a construction contract by the respondent, Konkan Railway C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — Limitation Period Under Bye-law 252(2) Starts from Date of Last Transaction, Not Subsequent Meetings. Claim for Rs. 78.63 lakhs arising from debit of Rs. 1.17 crores on 12 February 2008 held barred by limitation as claim was not filed within six months of last transaction.

25 Sep 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 1 October 2012 dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concilia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of 77 Employees Seeking Permanency Against Nagpur Municipal Corporation — Seasonal Workers Not Entitled to Automatic Permanent Status Under Model Standing Orders. The Court held that the burden of proving continuous service of 240 days in the preceding year was not discharged and the employer's classification of workers as seasonal was not arbitrary.

22 Mar 2006

The petitioners, 77 employees of the Nagpur Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 13.12.1994 of the Industrial Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence and Income Assessment Upheld. Tribunal's Award of Rs. 88,46,000/- with 12% Interest Confirmed as Based on Evidence.

11 Sep 2015

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the respondents (claimants) being the wife, daughter, and mother of the deceased Dilip M...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals by Cement Company Seeking Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquisition — Market Value Determined Based on Comparable Sales and Potential Use

7 Jul 2023

The appellant, M/s Bagalkot Cement & Industries Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, owned land in Bagalkot that was acquired b...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Modification of Benefits Date for Retrenched Labourers Under Government Resolution of 1988 — Benefits to be Released from 1-1-1996 Instead of 29-1-2020. Court holds that once reinstatement is ordered with continuity of service, the employee is entitled to the benefits of the Government Resolution from the date of initial appointment or from the date the resolution became effective, whichever is later, and not from the date of reinstatement.

23 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Mahesh Tulsidas Agarwat, was appointed as a Labourer in 1991 and his service was terminated in 2004. He approached the Labour Court, R...

106 107 108 109 110

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)