Search Results for "minor error"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "minor error"

2171 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2171 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Army Gunner’s Challenge to Dismissal for False Enrolment Answer. Summary Court Martial Conviction for Wilful False Statement Under Section 44 of Army Act Not Interfered With in Limited Judicial Review.

21 Jun 2016

The petitioner, a former Gunner Soldier, filed a writ petition challenging the order of Summary Court Martial dated 23 July 2001 and the subsequent di...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order Directing Buyout of Majority Stake in Wind Energy Company. The majority shareholder challenged the finding of oppression and the forced sale of shares to minority shareholders under sections 397, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956.

20 Aug 2015

The proceedings arose from disputes between the shareholders of Enercon (India) Limited, now known as Wind World (India) Limited, a company engaged in...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Rules on Arbitration Petition No.846 of 2014 Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. The Court Considers Whether the Arbitral Award Dated 22 March 2014 Should Be Set Aside in Light of Various Share Sale Agreements Between the Parties.

24 Apr 2015

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from an arbitration petition filed by Haresh Advani under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Admitted Second Appeal on Substantial Questions of Law Relating to Execution Sale Confirmation Under Order XXI Rule 92(3) of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Questions Framed on Inclusion of Property Not Attached or Auctioned in Sale Confirmation and Maintainability of Suit.

5 Aug 2005

...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.853 OF 2012

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Unproven Recovery; Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Sole Circumstance of Alleged Recovery Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt

14 Dec 2010

The present appeal arose from a judgment of the Extra Joint Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharkawada (Kelapur) in Sessions Trial No. 20 of 2004...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Slum Land Acquisition and Letter of Intent. Court Holds Petitioner's Ownership Interest Sufficient for Locus Standi but Upholds State Action Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

24 Nov 2010

The case involved two writ petitions filed in 1999 and 2000 under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a land acquisition notification dated 6-...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Allows Defendants' Second Appeal in Partition Suit as Alienee Proved Legal Necessity. Alienation of Ancestral Property by Disabled Manager Upheld Where Alienee Made Reasonable Enquiries and Believed in Good Faith that Necessity Existed.

7 May 2010

Background: The dispute concerned the alienation of ancestral agricultural lands belonging to a Hindu joint family. The original plaintiffs (responden...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Not Validly Taken Under Section 10(6) of ULC Act, 1976. Act of Court Should Not Injure Suitor; Repeal of ULC Act in 2008 Vests Land in Appellant.

3 Mar 2025

The appellant, M/S A.P. Electrical Equipment Corporation (now ECE Industries Limited), owned land in Fatehnagar Village, Rangareddy District, Telangan...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case — Review Jurisdiction Improperly Exercised by High Court. The Court held that the High Court's review order did not satisfy the grounds under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC and was an abuse of process.

2 Jul 2019

The present appeal arises from a long-standing property dispute concerning premises No. 43, Prithviraj Road, New Delhi. The property originally belong...

106 107 108 109 110

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)