Search Results for "limitation extension"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "limitation extension"

1177 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1177 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Dispute — Sets Aside Trial Court Order for Lack of Application of Mind. Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC Injunction Granted Without Proper Consideration of Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss.

24 Jul 2025

The appellant, Sri Yathievendra Naik @ Yathish, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking State Maintenance for Foreign Nationals Prohibited from Leaving India Due to Stay of Acquittal Appeal. State Not Obliged to Bear Lodging and Boarding Expenses of Acquitted Foreign Nationals Who Are Not in Custody; FRRO Directed to Issue Exit Permits Upon Compliance with Supreme Court Order.

1 Feb 2010

The petitioners, Mrs. Zainab Bte Yousuf (Singapore national) and Tetsyo Hiryama (Japanese national), were arrested on 27 November 2000 at Mumbai Inter...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application Under Rule 133 for Delay in Seeking Adjournment to Judge — Security Order Already Set Aside by Higher Courts. Application Filed Beyond Four-Day Limitation Period Without Sufficient Cause Under Rule 133 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980.

26 Nov 2010

The applicant, Suresh Lachhmandas Raheja, the original plaintiff in Suit No.3190 of 2006, filed an application under Rule 133 of the Bombay High Court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Tribunal Orders in Tenancy Dispute. Court upholds concurrent findings that petitioners failed to prove personal cultivation and that tenants were entitled to purchase land under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

7 Dec 2010

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Madhav Dashrath Vahadane and Nivrutti Dashrath Vahadane (petitioners) challenging orders passed u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order Under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejecting Settlement Application for Non-Disclosure of Full Income.

22 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Major Metals Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30 December 2010 passed by t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Notification Declaring Company as Relief Undertaking Under Bombay Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 — No Violation of Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) Found. The notification was issued to protect the company from legal proceedings and to enable its revival, and the court held that the Act does not require prior hearing or publication of reasons.

21 Mar 2012

The petitioners, residents of a housing society and social activists, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Obstructionists in Execution Proceedings — Purchasers During Pendency of Lis Not Bona Fide. Doctrine of Lis Pendens Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Applies to Execution Proceedings, and Purchasers During Pendency Are Bound by Decree.

12 Mar 2012

The case involves three second appeals arising from execution proceedings. The respondent decree holders (Respondent Nos.1-3) obtained a compromise de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application Under Section 197 of Income Tax Act for Lower Tax Deduction on Dividend Income. The court held that a Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) is sufficient evidence of residence for claiming treaty benefits under the India-Mauritius DTAA, and the Assessing Officer must consider the DTAA provisions.

26 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Indostar Capital, a Mauritius-based company incorporated in October 2010, held a Category 1 Global Business Licence and a Tax Residenc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Students' Petitions Challenging AICTE's Retrospective Reduction of Engineering Seats — Violation of Natural Justice and Legitimate Expectation. AICTE's power to regulate technical education does not include the power to retrospectively alter approved intake after admissions are finalized, as it violates principles of natural justice and legitimate expectation under Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution.

5 Jul 2019

The petitioners, students who had taken admission to engineering colleges in Maharashtra for the academic year 2019-20, challenged the decision of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Garnishee Order Against Third Party in Arbitral Proceedings. Interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be granted against a non-signatory to the arbitration agreement without a prima facie case of liability.

16 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Jatin Keshruwala, sole proprietor of Janvi Production, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,...

106 107 108 109 110

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)