Search Results for "default dismissal"

1908 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1908 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reprimands Advocate for Misconduct in Civil Revision Application Arising from Obstructionist Proceedings. Court Holds Advocate Must Act as Officer of Court and Not as Mere Mouthpiece of Client, Citing Section 49(1) of the Advocates Act, 1961.

The matter arose from a civil revision application before the Bombay High Court filed by the applicant, an obstructionist and son of the judgment debt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Refusal to Condon 12-Year Delay in Restoration Application. Limitation Rules Apply Equally to Government; No Sufficient Cause Shown for Inordinate Delay.

The dispute originated from a lease deed executed in 1951 for a bungalow in Pune Cantonment. The respondent (landlord) filed a civil suit in 1981 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unfair Trial. Sanctioning Authority Not Examined and Contents of Sanction Order Not Proved, Rendering Conviction Unsustainable Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Devidas Jagannath Joshi, was convicted by the Special Court (ACB), Nagpur, for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Decree Holder in Specific Performance Suit — Compromise Decree Held Executable Despite Alleged Lack of Court Verification. Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree Under Section 47 CPC Unless Decree is a Nullity on Face of Record.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the decree holder (Rehan Ahmad) against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court, which had set aside th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC set aside as sole eyewitness did not testify that the bus was driven rashly or negligently.

The applicant, Shivaji Damodar Karne, a bus driver employed with BEST, was convicted by the trial court (28th Esplanade Court, Mumbai) in CC No.40/P/9...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Accused for Murder Under Section 302 IPC in Black Magic Motive Case — Common Intention Established Through Eyewitness Testimony and Recovery of Weapon.

The case involves an appeal by four accused persons against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Eviction Suit Against MSEB in Rent Control Dispute — State Government Not the Tenant. The court held that MSEB was the tenant and the suit was maintainable, setting aside the concurrent decrees of the lower courts.

The petitioner, The Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (HSBC), filed a writ petition challenging the concurrent judgments of the Small C...