Search Results for "additional security deposit"

1218 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1218 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Accused's Petition in NDPS Act Case — Default Bail Granted Under Section 167(2) CrPC. Right to default bail cannot be defeated by seeking police custody for Section 27 discovery after charge sheet period expires.

The petitioner, Swapnil Gaikwad, was arrested in connection with an offence under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act)....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court declined to quash FIR in Land Fraud Case Under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 though Civil Nature of Dispute and Complaint by Power of Attorney Holder is sustained

The petitioner, accused No. 8 in a land fraud case, sought quashing of FIR registered under various sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Division Bench Hears Appeal against Single Judge's Order Directing CBFC to Issue Film Certificate. The appeal challenged the finding that referring the film to Revising Committee was without jurisdiction and the procedural fairness of the writ proceedings.

The appeal arose from a writ petition (W.P.No.380 of 2026) filed by the respondent, a film producer, seeking to quash the decision of the Central Boar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Contract Dispute — Remands Suit for Fresh Consideration on Merits. Failure to Frame Issues and Conduct Trial Rendered Decree Unsustainable Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC.

The present Commercial Appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 09/08/2019 passed by the learned District Judge-1, Jalna, in Commercial Suit No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contempt Petition and Allows Writ Appeals in Tender Cancellation Dispute. Court holds that cancellation of tender due to change in government policy does not amount to willful disobedience of court order under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The case involves a dispute over a tender issued by the State of Karnataka for the selection of a creative agency for the 'Invest Karnataka 2022' even...