Search Results for "additional district judge"

10338 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10338 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Refers Questions on Applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act to Temples to Full Bench. Division Bench Finds Arguable Questions Whether Temple is 'Commercial Establishment' Under Karnataka Shops Act and Whether Prior Precedent on Temple Employee's Gratuity is Correct.

The dispute arose when a former employee of Shri Mookambika Temple, Kollur, claimed gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 after his superan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Caste-Based Intent. Property Dispute Leading to Assault and Abuse Does Not Attract Atrocities Act Without Specific Intent to Insult on Caste Grounds.

The appellants, Vinod Thakare, Varsha Thakare, and Aakash Thakare, filed an appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Regular Second Appeals Involving Dispute Over Joint Family Property, Adoption, and Will. The LRs of Second Wife Challenge Decrees Dismissing Her Claim of Sole Ownership and Upholding Adoption of Shettygowda under Hindu Law.

The judgment concerns three Regular Second Appeals (RSA) filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from decrees in three o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Intent and Absence of Public View. Alleged Caste-Based Insults in Private Field Not Attracting Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The applicants, Angadh Kadam, Rohidas Kadam, and Indrajeet Kadam, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Convicts Advocate for Criminal Contempt for Disrupting Court Proceedings and Threatening Judge. Advocate's conduct of shouting, snatching notebook, and threatening judge amounts to criminal contempt under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The present criminal contempt petition was filed by Ashok Govindrao Bilolikar, the II Adhoc Additional District and Sessions Judge at Parbhani, under ...