Search Results for "Rule 12(5)"

1786 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1786 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Vice-Chancellor of Pune University; Holds No Violation of Prescribed Qualifications. Court Finds that Petitioner Failed to Prove That Incumbent Lacked Essential Qualifications Under the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Dr. Prabhakar J. Lavakare challenging the appointment of Respondent No.4, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Interim Measures in Arbitration Dispute Over Subsea Pipeline Subcontract. Appellate Bench Reviews Single Judge's Order Requiring Deposit of Invoice Amount Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Bombay High Court, in its commercial appellate jurisdiction, heard two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Online Booking Convenience Fees. The Court considered whether service charges exceeding Rs.10 per ticket form part of 'payment for admission' under Section 2(b) of Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act, 1923.

The writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an amendment to the Maharashtra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Holds Partial Abatement Only. Death of some appellants during pendency of appeal does not abate entire appeal; decree not a nullity under Order 22 CPC.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for partition and separate possession. The original suit was filed by the plaintiffs (now respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance After Trial Commenced — Amendment Sought After Cross-Examination of Plaintiff's Witness Held Not Barred by Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Trial Had Not Concluded and Amendment Was Necessary for Determining Real Controversy

The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, the original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 28-11-2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST with Interest for Zero-Rated Export Supplies Under CGST and IGST Acts. Petitioner entitled to refund of IGST paid on export of goods along with interest from date of shipping bill till actual refund.

The petitioner, Shri Charan Singh Surjit Singh Gujral, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of J...