Search Results for "time barred"

5522 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5522 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Reinstatement and Backwages Due to Limitation Under Section 42(4) of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. Approach Notice Filed Beyond Stipulated Period Without Sufficient Cause, Hence Labour Court's Order Set Aside.

The petitioner, Pedru Mozes Fernandes, was a permanent workman employed as a boiler serviceman at Tata Mills from 1st March 1973. He worked continuous...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Easement of Necessity Case — Plaintiff Entitled to Use Disputed Way Despite Earlier Withdrawn Suit. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Does Not Bar Fresh Suit When Subject Matter Differs and Withdrawal Was Without Liberty.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for declaration of easement of necessity and injunction concerning a disputed way over Survey No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Partition Suit — Order VII Rule 11 CPC Not Applicable When Suit Not Barred by Law. The pendency of a probate proceeding does not bar a suit for partition and the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

The appellant, Sri Venkatalingaiah Murthy, filed a petition for Letters of Administration (P&SC No.63/2011) in respect of the Will of late Sri K. Moha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award Rejecting Salvor's Claims for Idling Charges in Salvage Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that salvor failed to prove breach of contract and damages, and that claims were barred by accord and satisfaction.

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to an arbitral award passed by a three-member tribunal i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...