Search Results for "registration rules"

4352 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4352 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Employee in MEPS Act Termination Case; Management's Writ Dismissed. Permanent Teacher's Termination Without Inquiry Violates Rules 33, 36 and 37 of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 and Section 5(2) Protection.

The dispute concerned termination of a permanent teacher by a private school management without holding an inquiry. The employee was appointed in 1991...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of “Deep and Pervasive Control” in Grant-in-Aid Disputes. Supreme Court Holds ICSSR Not Liable for Salaries of CRRID Employees; Grants Discretionary, Not a Matter of Right

Nature of the Litigation: The case involved a dispute between the Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR) and Centre for Research in Rura...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Borrowers' Challenge Against DRT Orders Rejecting Interim Relief Despite Pending IBC Section 95 Petition. Interim Moratorium Under Section 96 IBC Bars Continuation of Securitisation Proceedings During Pendency of Insolvency Petition.

The petitioners, M/s. Kapole Advertising Agency and others, were the original borrowers who had approached the Bombay High Court challenging two order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Challenge to Disqualification of Councillors for Defying Party Whip. The Court Examines Whether the Collector's Order Disqualifying Councillors Under Section 3(1)(b) of Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986 Was Legally Sustainable.

The case arose from the election of the President of Ausa Municipal Council after the post fell vacant due to the resignation of the sitting President...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Commercial Pilot License for Violation of Natural Justice. License Suspension Order Set Aside as Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Grounds and Opportunity of Hearing Was Not Granted.

The petitioner, Jeetendra Krishna Varma, a commercial pilot, obtained his Commercial Pilot License (CPL) after training in the USA. Upon returning to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes LBT Assessment Orders for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. Assessment Orders Passed Without Proper Show Cause Notice and Without Considering Objections Violate Principles of Natural Justice Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act.

The petitioner, Kokuyo Camlin Ltd., filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two assessment orders dated 13...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction of State Tax Officer Under IGST; Confiscation of Arecanut Goods Upheld. Court Holds that Section 4 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Does Not Require Separate Notification for Cross-Empowerment of State Officers.

The petitioner, a proprietorship concern dealing in arecanut, challenged a series of orders passed by the Commercial Tax Officer (Enforcement) under t...