Search Results for "prior finding binding"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "prior finding binding"

2492 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2492 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Brutal Rape and Murder of Two-Year-Old Child. Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Testimony Confirm Guilt Under Sections 302, 363, 376, 377 IPC.

3 Oct 2019

The case involves the brutal kidnapping, rape, unnatural offence, and murder of a two-year-old girl by the appellant, Ravi S/o Ashok Ghumare, in Jalna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Enforcing Negative Covenants in E-Sports Collaboration Agreement. Court restrains Defendants from associating with competing platforms and disclosing confidential information pending trial.

6 Dec 2022

The Plaintiff, Stoughton Street Tech Labs Pvt. Ltd., operates LOCO, an online live streaming and e-sports gaming platform. It entered into a Collabora...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Notice Under Section 89 of MRTP Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — Prior Civil Court Decree Declaring Petitioner as Lessee and Not Trespasser Bars Corporation from Issuing Notice Under Different Act

19 Apr 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Iqbal & Brothers, a partnership firm, challenged a notice dated 2nd December 1997 issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Society's Petition, Quashes Revision Order Against Re-Audit Report Under Section 81(6) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. Re-audit report is a mere opinion, not a decision or order, and revision under Section 154 is not maintainable.

4 Feb 2025

The Bombay High Court dealt with two writ petitions arising from a dispute concerning the re-audit of a cooperative society registered under the Mahar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

High Court

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

18 Jun 2024

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.1501 OF 2016

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in Service Matter, Directs Appointment of Selected Candidates to Abolished Post. Court held that abolition of cadre by executive order without amending statutory rules is invalid, and selected candidates with legitimate expectation must be appointed under the Karnataka Municipal Corporation (Common Recruitment of Officers and Employees) Rules, 2011.

23 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a writ appeal filed by three appellants against the judgment of a single judge in W.P.No.7190/2022, which upheld the State Gove...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition of Allottee in KIADB Act Case — Condition Requiring Prior Permission for Share Transfer Declared Ultra Vires. The Court held that the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board cannot impose restrictions on transfer of shares of an allottee company as such power is not conferred by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

12 Jan 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Kamalalayaa Real Estates LLP, a limited liability partnership firm, was allotted land by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Developme...

105 106 107 108 109

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)